PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTWX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCTWX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class C (FCTWX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTWX achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FCTWX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 7.07%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.46% annualized return.


FCTWX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.04%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.70%
1Y
16.70%
3Y*
11.62%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
7.07%

FCNTX

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.72%
YTD
8.01%
6M
10.12%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
27.03%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
17.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTWX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCTWX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class C
6.72%14.97%6.84%12.34%-17.47%8.75%13.09%19.07%-6.34%14.62%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
8.01%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTWX and FCNTX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.87

The correlation between FCTWX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCTWX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTWX
FCTWX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FCTWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTWX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class C (FCTWX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCTWXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

1.83

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

2.54

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.33

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.26

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.99

9.62

+1.37

FCTWX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTWX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCTWXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.83

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.79

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.89

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.78

-0.35

Drawdowns

FCTWX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTWX drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, roughly equal to the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTWX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTWXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-49.19%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.58%

-11.30%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.78%

-19.75%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.34%

-32.59%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.34%

-32.59%

+8.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-8.16%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

2.65%

-1.11%

Volatility

FCTWX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class C (FCTWX) is 2.95%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that FCTWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCTWXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

3.24%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.71%

10.48%

-3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.03%

14.06%

-6.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.90%

19.15%

-9.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.13%

19.68%

-9.55%

FCTWX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTWX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCTWX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FCTWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than FCNTX's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.32%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FCTWX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class C
7.36%7.21%3.17%1.33%8.34%8.77%5.65%5.88%8.78%3.95%3.79%4.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCTWX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to FCTWX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTWX dropped -49.97% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FCTWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCTWX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer