PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTTX vs. NZF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCTTX vs. NZF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Connecticut Municipal Bond Fund (FCTTX) and Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTTX achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than NZF's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FCTTX has underperformed NZF with an annualized return of 1.40%, while NZF has yielded a comparatively higher 3.16% annualized return.


FCTTX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-2.16%
6M
-0.18%
YTD
0.51%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
2.97%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*
1.40%
ALL TIME*
4.12%

NZF

1D
-0.73%
1M
-2.79%
6M
1.93%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
-1.05%
10Y*
3.16%
ALL TIME*
5.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$6.09M$6.45M$6.65M

FCTTX vs. NZF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCTTX
Nuveen Connecticut Municipal Bond Fund
0.51%3.19%2.28%5.82%-11.17%2.26%4.36%6.94%0.71%4.18%
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
1.35%11.78%10.09%2.49%-25.53%11.19%3.58%28.33%-6.79%14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTTX and NZF is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2001

0.31

The correlation between FCTTX and NZF shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCTTX vs. NZF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCTTX
FCTTX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FCTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

NZF
NZF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
NZF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NZF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCTTX vs. NZF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Connecticut Municipal Bond Fund (FCTTX) and Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCTTXNZFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.22

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.55

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

6.35

+1.87

FCTTX vs. NZF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the NZF Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTTX and NZF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCTTX vs. NZF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTTX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum NZF drawdown of -48.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTTX and NZF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTTXNZFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-48.55%

+32.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.57%

-8.11%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.62%

-13.54%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.28%

-37.42%

+21.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.28%

-37.42%

+21.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-5.67%

+3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-7.75%

+5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

1.97%

-1.16%

Volatility

FCTTX vs. NZF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Connecticut Municipal Bond Fund (FCTTX) is 1.07%, while Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that FCTTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NZF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCTTXNZFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

2.12%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

8.08%

-5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

10.58%

-7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.34%

12.39%

-8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.11%

13.09%

-8.98%

FCTTX vs. NZF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTTX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than NZF's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCTTX vs. NZF - Dividend Comparison

FCTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than NZF's 7.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCTTX
Nuveen Connecticut Municipal Bond Fund
2.74%3.19%2.99%2.75%2.68%2.32%2.83%3.16%3.10%3.23%3.08%3.34%
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
7.82%7.58%6.84%4.51%5.80%4.63%4.74%4.82%6.05%5.86%6.26%5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCTTX and NZF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NZF has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to FCTTX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTTX dropped -16.28% vs NZF's -48.55%.

FCTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCTTX and NZF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer