FCTDX vs. FMRAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FCTDX (Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund) and FMRAX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030) are both mutual funds - FCTDX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FMRAX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by BlackRock. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FCTDX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FMRAX.

Performance

FCTDX vs. FMRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 (FMRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FCTDX

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: -0.66%
• 6M: 9.69%
• YTD: 12.81%
• 1Y: 22.60%
• 3Y*: 19.08%
• 5Y*: 12.15%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.78%

FMRAX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCTDX Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FCTDX vs. FMRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCTDX Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund	12.81%	15.63%	23.13%	26.72%	-17.93%	25.40%	22.20%	12.96%
FMRAX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030	4.99%	14.35%	7.19%	12.51%	-16.27%	8.90%	13.83%	7.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTDX and FMRAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2019	0.84

The correlation between FCTDX and FMRAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCTDX vs. FMRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCTDX

FCTDX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FCTDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FCTDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FCTDX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FCTDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FCTDX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FMRAX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCTDX vs. FMRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 (FMRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCTDX	FMRAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.57	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FCTDX	FMRAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.11%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCTDX	FMRAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.65%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.59%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.58%	—	—

FCTDX vs. FMRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FMRAX's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCTDX vs. FMRAX - Dividend Comparison

FCTDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than FMRAX's 2.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCTDX Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund	5.64%	1.90%	4.33%	2.26%	5.75%	7.90%	2.73%	2.89%	2.38%
FMRAX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030	2.46%	2.57%	2.50%	2.39%	4.02%	4.74%	3.01%	1.60%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCTDX and FMRAX in my portfolio?

FCTDX and FMRAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.