FCT vs. DFRPX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FCT (First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II) and DFRPX (DWS Floating Rate Fund Class S) are both Bank Loan funds. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCT charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for DFRPX.

Performance

FCT vs. DFRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II (FCT) and DWS Floating Rate Fund Class S (DFRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FCT

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -0.85%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 6M: 7.80%
• 1Y: 9.53%
• 3Y*: 12.40%
• 5Y*: 5.15%
• 10Y*: 5.99%

DFRPX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCT vs. DFRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCT First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II	0.95%	9.24%	14.91%	18.06%	-14.54%	13.72%	2.73%	20.13%	-8.07%	-1.07%
DFRPX DWS Floating Rate Fund Class S	0.38%	3.45%	7.72%	11.42%	-1.52%	3.75%	0.89%	8.69%	-0.58%	1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FCT and DFRPX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007	0.24

The correlation between FCT and DFRPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCT vs. DFRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCT

FCT Risk / Return Rank: 22
FCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FCT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FCT Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCT vs. DFRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II (FCT) and DWS Floating Rate Fund Class S (DFRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCT	DFRPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCT	DFRPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FCT	DFRPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.98%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCT	DFRPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.02%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.45%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.03%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	—	—

FCT vs. DFRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DFRPX's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCT vs. DFRPX - Dividend Comparison

FCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.15%, more than DFRPX's 5.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFRPX DWS Floating Rate Fund Class S	5.11%	5.99%	8.67%	8.22%	4.25%	3.31%	3.75%	4.80%	4.21%	4.39%	4.76%	4.63%
FCT First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II	12.15%	11.56%	11.25%	10.62%	9.03%	9.23%	9.88%	6.60%	6.49%	6.16%	6.11%	7.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCT and DFRPX in my portfolio?

FCT and DFRPX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.