PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCSRX vs. BWBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCSRX vs. BWBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSRX achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly higher than BWBIX's 2.12% return.


FCSRX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-2.57%
YTD
5.28%
6M
4.91%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
7.95%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
4.39%

BWBIX

1D
0.59%
1M
2.88%
YTD
2.12%
6M
0.45%
1Y
12.10%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSRX vs. BWBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
5.28%9.27%4.75%3.60%-4.26%14.68%2.60%9.54%-4.81%
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
2.12%10.23%19.62%25.77%-32.58%14.76%62.85%36.41%-12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSRX and BWBIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2018

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between FCSRX and BWBIX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCSRX vs. BWBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSRX
FCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BWBIX
BWBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BWBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BWBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSRX vs. BWBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCSRXBWBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.14

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

0.96

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.98

3.12

+11.86

FCSRX vs. BWBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the BWBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSRX and BWBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCSRX vs. BWBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSRX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, smaller than the maximum BWBIX drawdown of -39.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSRX and BWBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCSRXBWBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.91%

-39.14%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.50%

-11.65%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.85%

-21.59%

+15.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.22%

-39.14%

+25.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.50%

-4.65%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-11.65%

+6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

3.58%

-2.84%

Volatility

FCSRX vs. BWBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) is 1.44%, while Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that FCSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCSRXBWBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

7.21%

-5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.75%

11.70%

-7.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78%

15.59%

-10.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.90%

21.26%

-14.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.71%

23.17%

-16.46%

FCSRX vs. BWBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSRX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BWBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCSRX vs. BWBIX - Dividend Comparison

FCSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than BWBIX's 7.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
7.45%7.61%0.77%0.06%3.21%3.75%1.24%3.51%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
3.36%3.74%3.86%4.35%6.51%4.53%1.32%2.20%8.51%1.58%1.34%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCSRX and BWBIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWBIX has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to FCSRX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSRX dropped -33.91% vs BWBIX's -39.14%.

FCSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCSRX and BWBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer