FCSH vs. TSEC
FCSH (Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF) and TSEC (Touchstone Securitized Income ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FCSH returned 4.30% vs 6.08% for TSEC. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCSH charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TSEC.
Performance
FCSH vs. TSEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCSH achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than TSEC's 1.26% return.
FCSH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSEC
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCSH vs. TSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF | 0.67% | 6.42% | 4.66% | 3.27% |
TSEC Touchstone Securitized Income ETF | 1.26% | 7.47% | 7.62% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCSH and TSEC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCSH vs. TSEC — Risk / Return Rank
FCSH
TSEC
FCSH vs. TSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) and Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCSH | TSEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.51 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 3.65 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.31 | 11.93 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCSH | TSEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.27 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 2.59 | -1.73 |
Drawdowns
FCSH vs. TSEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSH drawdown since its inception was -8.47%, which is greater than TSEC's maximum drawdown of -1.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSH and TSEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCSH | TSEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -1.78% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.24% | -1.67% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.33% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -0.33% | -1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 0.51% | -0.16% |
Volatility
FCSH vs. TSEC - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC) at 0.53%. This indicates that FCSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCSH | TSEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 0.53% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.53% | 2.07% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95% | 2.70% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.89% | 2.90% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.89% | 2.90% | -0.01% |
FCSH vs. TSEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCSH has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TSEC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCSH vs. TSEC - Dividend Comparison
FCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than TSEC's 7.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF | 4.08% | 4.14% | 4.44% | 2.31% | 1.76% | 0.04% |
TSEC Touchstone Securitized Income ETF | 7.30% | 6.47% | 5.83% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCSH and TSEC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCSH has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to TSEC (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSH dropped -8.47% vs TSEC's -1.78%.
On 1-year performance, TSEC leads with 6.08% vs 4.30% for FCSH. On fees, FCSH is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSEC has performed better with a 6.08% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCSH is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TSEC.
TSEC has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 4.08% for FCSH.
They also come from different issuers: Federated and Touchstone. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FCSH and 0.40% for TSEC.
TSEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCSH and TSEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer