PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCSH vs. DDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCSH vs. DDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSH achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.46% return.


FCSH

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.14%
6M
0.41%
YTD
0.65%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.35%

DDV

1D
0.11%
1M
0.06%
6M
1.65%
YTD
2.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$77.01K$47.65K$101.82K
$23.61K$21.88K$31.43K

FCSH vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCSH and DDV is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCSH vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCSH
FCSH Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DDV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCSH vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCSHDDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

FCSH vs. DDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCSH vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSH drawdown since its inception was -8.47%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSH and DDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCSHDDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-1.92%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.18%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-0.34%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

Volatility

FCSH vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCSHDDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

2.64%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.87%

2.64%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.87%

2.64%

+0.23%

FCSH vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSH has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCSH vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison

FCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than DDV's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
1.62%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCSH
Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF
4.23%4.14%4.44%2.31%1.76%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCSH and DDV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FCSH.

FCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 1.62% for DDV.

FCSH is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Federated and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FCSH and 0.25% for DDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCSH and DDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer