PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCSDX vs. BWBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCSDX vs. BWBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class C (FCSDX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSDX achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly higher than BWBIX's 1.98% return.


FCSDX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.62%
YTD
12.67%
6M
12.31%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
8.89%

BWBIX

1D
-3.11%
1M
3.27%
YTD
1.98%
6M
0.41%
1Y
12.21%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSDX vs. BWBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCSDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class C
12.67%11.86%10.33%8.38%-10.86%17.81%10.16%21.23%-3.23%
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
1.98%10.23%19.62%25.77%-32.58%14.76%62.85%36.41%-12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSDX and BWBIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2018

0.79

The correlation between FCSDX and BWBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCSDX vs. BWBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSDX
FCSDX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FCSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BWBIX
BWBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BWBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BWBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSDX vs. BWBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class C (FCSDX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCSDXBWBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.17

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

1.20

+2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.21

3.93

+12.28

FCSDX vs. BWBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the BWBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSDX and BWBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCSDX vs. BWBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSDX drawdown since its inception was -59.48%, which is greater than BWBIX's maximum drawdown of -39.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSDX and BWBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCSDXBWBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.48%

-39.14%

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.83%

-11.65%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-21.59%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.78%

-39.14%

+21.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-4.78%

+4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.95%

-11.65%

+4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

3.55%

-2.15%

Volatility

FCSDX vs. BWBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class C (FCSDX) is 2.53%, while Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that FCSDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCSDXBWBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

7.20%

-4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.50%

11.71%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.44%

15.67%

-7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.98%

21.26%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.44%

23.18%

-10.74%

FCSDX vs. BWBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSDX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than BWBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCSDX vs. BWBIX - Dividend Comparison

FCSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than BWBIX's 7.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
7.46%7.61%0.77%0.06%3.21%3.75%1.24%3.51%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCSDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class C
6.18%6.96%4.24%4.70%3.17%7.40%4.74%5.70%7.06%5.87%3.97%5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCSDX and BWBIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWBIX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to FCSDX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSDX dropped -59.48% vs BWBIX's -39.14%.

FCSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCSDX and BWBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer