FCRR.TO vs. FCCM.NEO
FCRR.TO (Fidelity U.S. Dividend for Rising Rates ETF) and FCCM.NEO (Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCRR.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCCM.NEO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian Momentum Index. FCRR.TO is actively managed, while FCCM.NEO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCRR.TO returned 12.52%/yr vs 18.62%/yr for FCCM.NEO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCRR.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FCCM.NEO.
Performance
FCRR.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCRR.TO achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly higher than FCCM.NEO's 11.38% return.
FCRR.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 12.05%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- —
FCCM.NEO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 41.08%
- 3Y*
- 28.97%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- —
FCRR.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCRR.TO Fidelity U.S. Dividend for Rising Rates ETF | 14.88% | 3.53% | 29.84% | 12.53% | -6.47% | 29.36% | 14.80% |
FCCM.NEO Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF | 11.38% | 43.17% | 27.03% | 10.10% | -3.42% | 14.23% | 9.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCRR.TO and FCCM.NEO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2020 | 0.26 |
The correlation between FCRR.TO and FCCM.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCRR.TO vs. FCCM.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FCRR.TO
FCCM.NEO
FCRR.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Dividend for Rising Rates ETF (FCRR.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCRR.TO | FCCM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.46 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 3.34 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 13.98 | -12.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCRR.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCRR.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.45%, which is greater than FCCM.NEO's maximum drawdown of -16.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCRR.TO and FCCM.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCRR.TO | FCCM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.45% | -16.59% | -14.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.61% | -12.36% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.61% | -12.36% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -16.59% | -2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -0.95% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -2.59% | -2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.29% | 2.95% | +6.34% |
Volatility
FCRR.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. Dividend for Rising Rates ETF (FCRR.TO) is 2.41%, while Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that FCRR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCCM.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCRR.TO | FCCM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 2.95% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.89% | 13.53% | -4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 16.44% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 13.70% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 13.49% | +3.33% |
FCRR.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCRR.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FCCM.NEO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCRR.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FCRR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than FCCM.NEO's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCM.NEO Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF | 0.82% | 0.91% | 0.91% | 1.32% | 1.79% | 1.49% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCRR.TO Fidelity U.S. Dividend for Rising Rates ETF | 1.55% | 1.86% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.08% | 1.59% | 2.53% | 2.27% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCRR.TO and FCCM.NEO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCRR.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCRR.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FCCM.NEO.
FCRR.TO is categorized as Dividend, while FCCM.NEO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCRR.TO and 0.38% for FCCM.NEO.
Find the right allocation for FCRR.TO and FCCM.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer