FCRIX vs. RYMQX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FCRIX (FS Credit Income Fund Class I) and RYMQX (Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, FCRIX returned 4.46%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for RYMQX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCRIX charges 2.37%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for RYMQX.

Performance

FCRIX vs. RYMQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FS Credit Income Fund Class I (FCRIX) and Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCRIX achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than RYMQX's 5.34% return.

FCRIX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 2.81%
• 6M: 3.59%
• 1Y: 8.18%
• 3Y*: 9.12%
• 5Y*: 4.46%
• 10Y*: —

RYMQX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 5.34%
• 6M: 6.32%
• 1Y: 9.17%
• 3Y*: 1.76%
• 5Y*: 0.28%
• 10Y*: 2.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCRIX vs. RYMQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCRIX FS Credit Income Fund Class I	2.81%	7.88%	9.57%	11.96%	-10.70%	7.50%	8.27%	2.47%
RYMQX Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund	5.34%	1.58%	-3.59%	4.26%	-3.47%	7.17%	7.40%	0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FCRIX and RYMQX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2019	0.14

The correlation between FCRIX and RYMQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCRIX vs. RYMQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCRIX

FCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

RYMQX

RYMQX Risk / Return Rank: 68
RYMQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RYMQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
RYMQX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RYMQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
RYMQX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCRIX vs. RYMQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS Credit Income Fund Class I (FCRIX) and Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCRIX	RYMQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	2.18	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	11.66	3.27	+8.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.81	1.43	+1.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.04	4.02	+5.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	40.38	13.76	+26.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCRIX vs. RYMQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the RYMQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCRIX and RYMQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCRIX	RYMQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	2.18	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.06	0.05	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.20	+0.67

Drawdowns

FCRIX vs. RYMQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCRIX drawdown since its inception was -26.74%, smaller than the maximum RYMQX drawdown of -29.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCRIX and RYMQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCRIX	RYMQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.74%	-29.13%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.90%	-2.22%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.01%	-13.98%	+10.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.33%	-13.98%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-13.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-2.23%	+2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-8.88%	+5.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	0.65%	-0.45%

Volatility

FCRIX vs. RYMQX - Volatility Comparison

FS Credit Income Fund Class I (FCRIX) and Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX) have volatilities of 0.69% and 0.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCRIX	RYMQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.69%	0.67%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.94%	3.37%	-1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00%	4.11%	-1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.22%	5.68%	-1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.41%	5.29%	+1.12%

FCRIX vs. RYMQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCRIX has a 2.37% expense ratio, which is higher than RYMQX's 1.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCRIX vs. RYMQX - Dividend Comparison

FCRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.11%, more than RYMQX's 9.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FCRIX FS Credit Income Fund Class I	10.11%	10.54%	8.27%	5.56%	3.25%	5.62%	5.72%	2.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYMQX Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund	9.62%	10.13%	2.89%	3.12%	1.67%	0.78%	1.03%	2.10%	0.16%	0.00%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCRIX and RYMQX in my portfolio?

FCRIX and RYMQX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCRIX or RYMQX?

FCRIX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to RYMQX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCRIX dropped -26.74% vs RYMQX's -29.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.