FCPI vs. CGDV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FCPI (Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCPI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Stocks for Inflation Factor Index, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. FCPI is passively managed, while CGDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FCPI returned 20.75%/yr vs 24.17%/yr for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCPI charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.

Performance

FCPI vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCPI achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.07% return.

FCPI

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 6M: 6.63%
• 1Y: 19.48%
• 3Y*: 20.75%
• 5Y*: 13.89%
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 11.07%
• 6M: 10.39%
• 1Y: 27.24%
• 3Y*: 24.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCPI vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FCPI Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF	9.35%	16.24%	25.54%	15.40%	-0.63%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	11.07%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FCPI and CGDV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.90

The correlation between FCPI and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCPI vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCPI	CGDV
Technology	31.5%	33.1%
Healthcare	12.6%	10.4%
Energy	10.6%	4.4%
Financial Services	7.6%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	11.3%
Industrials	6.2%	12.9%
Basic Materials	6.1%	2.8%
Communication Services	4.8%	8.3%
Real Estate	4.3%	1.1%
Utilities	2.0%	1.0%

Return for Risk

FCPI vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCPI

FCPI Risk / Return Rank: 50
FCPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FCPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FCPI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FCPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FCPI Martin Ratio Rank: 59

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 69
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCPI vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCPI	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.23	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	3.06	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.41	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	2.81	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.87	13.07	-3.20

FCPI vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCPI and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCPI vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCPI drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPI and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCPI	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.26%	-21.82%	-15.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.88%	-9.75%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.44%	-14.28%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-1.79%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-3.59%	-0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	2.09%	-0.11%

Volatility

FCPI vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) have volatilities of 4.82% and 4.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCPI	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.82%	4.64%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.13%	9.92%	+0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.43%	12.28%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.74%	15.57%	+1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.12%	15.57%	+4.55%

FCPI vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCPI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCPI vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

FCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than CGDV's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.18%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCPI Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF	1.63%	1.74%	1.29%	1.88%	1.77%	1.19%	3.53%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCPI and CGDV in my portfolio?

FCPI and CGDV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCPI or CGDV?

FCPI has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to CGDV (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCPI dropped -37.26% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which ETF is better, FCPI or CGDV?

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.17% vs 20.75% for FCPI. On fees, FCPI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCPI or CGDV?

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.17% return vs 20.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCPI or CGDV?

FCPI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCPI or CGDV?

FCPI has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.18% for CGDV.

What is the main difference between FCPI and CGDV?

FCPI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FCPI and 0.33% for CGDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.