FCPAX vs. TBGVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class A (FCPAX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX).
FCPAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. TBGVX is managed by Tweedy, Browne. It was launched on Jun 14, 1993.
Performance
FCPAX vs. TBGVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCPAX vs. TBGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPAX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class A | -4.94% | 18.40% | 7.76% | 27.31% | -26.75% | 11.98% | 21.90% | 32.36% | -13.07% | 35.50% |
TBGVX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund | 3.44% | 23.86% | 2.47% | 12.48% | -7.52% | 15.62% | -1.00% | 14.64% | -6.72% | 15.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCPAX achieves a -4.94% return, which is significantly lower than TBGVX's 3.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPAX has outperformed TBGVX with an annualized return of 8.83%, while TBGVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.70% annualized return.
FCPAX
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- -4.94%
- 6M
- -5.48%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.75%
- 5Y*
- 4.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
TBGVX
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCPAX vs. TBGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCPAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than TBGVX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCPAX vs. TBGVX — Risk / Return Rank
FCPAX
TBGVX
FCPAX vs. TBGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class A (FCPAX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCPAX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | 1.58 | -1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 2.13 | -1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.34 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 1.74 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 6.58 | -4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCPAX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 1.58 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.72 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.73 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCPAX and TBGVX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCPAX vs. TBGVX - Dividend Comparison
FCPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, less than TBGVX's 11.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPAX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class A | 6.00% | 5.70% | 0.54% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 3.84% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.22% | 0.05% | 0.11% | 0.05% |
TBGVX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund | 11.71% | 12.11% | 9.95% | 4.55% | 5.68% | 8.89% | 0.94% | 1.88% | 6.74% | 1.10% | 3.16% | 4.94% |
Drawdowns
FCPAX vs. TBGVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCPAX drawdown since its inception was -65.31%, which is greater than TBGVX's maximum drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPAX and TBGVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCPAX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.31% | -50.97% | -14.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.47% | -9.56% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.36% | -17.71% | -19.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.36% | -31.18% | -6.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.41% | -7.46% | -3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.09% | -6.09% | -9.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 2.66% | +1.03% |
Volatility
FCPAX vs. TBGVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class A (FCPAX) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) at 4.70%. This indicates that FCPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCPAX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.80% | 4.70% | +4.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.86% | 7.39% | +5.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.77% | 12.36% | +7.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 11.03% | +7.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 12.64% | +5.22% |