PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCNTX vs. FTQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCNTX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNTX achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNTX has underperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 17.16%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.25% annualized return.


FCNTX

1D
2.04%
1M
-0.68%
6M
6.92%
YTD
9.08%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
25.01%
5Y*
13.67%
10Y*
17.16%
ALL TIME*
13.53%

FTQGX

1D
1.41%
1M
-2.91%
6M
15.93%
YTD
21.52%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
26.03%
5Y*
14.05%
10Y*
18.25%
ALL TIME*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCNTX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
9.08%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
21.52%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNTX and FTQGX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 1996

0.93

The correlation between FCNTX and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCNTX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCNTX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCNTXFTQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.55

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

8.51

-2.48

FCNTX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNTX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCNTX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNTX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNTX and FTQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCNTXFTQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.19%

-61.29%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-12.76%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.75%

-26.84%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

-32.31%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

-32.31%

-0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-8.19%

+6.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-14.14%

+6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.81%

-0.90%

Volatility

FCNTX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) is 4.63%, while Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that FCNTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCNTXFTQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

6.50%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

18.81%

-6.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

22.74%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.40%

22.26%

-2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

21.84%

-2.09%

FCNTX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNTX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQGX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCNTX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than FTQGX's 10.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.28%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
10.24%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCNTX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQGX has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to FCNTX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNTX dropped -49.19% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCNTX and FTQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer