FTQGX vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FTQGX (Fidelity Focused Stock Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FTQGX is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTQGX returned 17.90%/yr vs 18.27%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FTQGX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

FTQGX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTQGX achieves a 18.58% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTQGX having a 17.90% annualized return and SCHG not far ahead at 18.27%.

FTQGX

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: -5.27%
• 6M: 14.61%
• YTD: 18.58%
• 1Y: 29.14%
• 3Y*: 24.19%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: 17.90%
• ALL TIME*: 10.49%

SCHG

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 21.39%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 18.27%
• ALL TIME*: 16.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$247.66M	$249.87M	$339.91M

FTQGX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	18.58%	13.65%	36.95%	28.94%	-26.68%	26.91%	33.41%	31.44%	4.90%	30.66%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	4.99%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FTQGX and SCHG is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.93

The correlation between FTQGX and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FTQGX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTQGX

FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 30
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTQGX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTQGX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	0.82	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	1.20	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.15	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	0.83	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.94	2.62	+4.32

FTQGX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTQGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTQGX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTQGX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTQGX drawdown since its inception was -61.29%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQGX and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTQGX	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.29%	-34.59%	-26.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.76%	-16.41%	+3.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.84%	-23.39%	-3.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.31%	-34.59%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.31%	-34.59%	+2.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.41%	-3.10%	-7.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.14%	-5.19%	-8.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.73%	5.19%	-1.46%

Volatility

FTQGX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.32%. This indicates that FTQGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTQGX	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.79%	4.32%	+2.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.80%	12.90%	+5.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.84%	16.67%	+6.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.25%	22.42%	-0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.83%	21.59%	+0.24%

FTQGX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTQGX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTQGX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FTQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.49%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	10.49%	12.44%	9.94%	0.61%	7.96%	13.53%	11.41%	5.07%	14.71%	5.89%	1.08%	5.91%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTQGX and SCHG in my portfolio?

FTQGX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTQGX or SCHG?

FTQGX has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to SCHG (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQGX dropped -61.29% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.