FCNTX vs. FSRBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX).
FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967. FSRBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.
Performance
FCNTX vs. FSRBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCNTX vs. FSRBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -4.61% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | -0.77% | 11.11% | 30.13% | 8.48% | -12.61% | 38.21% | -11.73% | 35.60% | -19.04% | 12.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCNTX achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly lower than FSRBX's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNTX has outperformed FSRBX with an annualized return of 16.17%, while FSRBX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.06% annualized return.
FCNTX
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -1.83%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 24.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 16.17%
FSRBX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -1.55%
- 1Y
- 28.23%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCNTX vs. FSRBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCNTX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRBX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCNTX vs. FSRBX — Risk / Return Rank
FCNTX
FSRBX
FCNTX vs. FSRBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCNTX | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.55 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 0.86 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.13 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.02 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.67 | 2.62 | +4.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCNTX | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.55 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.30 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.38 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.43 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCNTX and FSRBX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCNTX vs. FSRBX - Dividend Comparison
FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than FSRBX's 1.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 4.89% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | 1.49% | 1.47% | 4.49% | 5.35% | 6.12% | 3.36% | 8.63% | 5.90% | 32.02% | 2.57% | 0.76% | 5.64% |
Drawdowns
FCNTX vs. FSRBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCNTX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, smaller than the maximum FSRBX drawdown of -76.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNTX and FSRBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCNTX | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.19% | -76.89% | +27.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -15.60% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.59% | -41.95% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.59% | -51.23% | +18.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.46% | -10.70% | +3.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -13.30% | +5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 6.06% | -3.04% |
Volatility
FCNTX vs. FSRBX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) at 5.59%. This indicates that FCNTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCNTX | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 5.59% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.15% | 18.38% | -7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.96% | 27.58% | -7.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 26.92% | -7.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 29.52% | -9.88% |