FCMVX vs. HNMVX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FCMVX (Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund) and HNMVX (Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FCMVX returned 26.34%/yr vs 13.70%/yr for HNMVX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FCMVX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for HNMVX.

Performance

FCMVX vs. HNMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class (HNMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCMVX achieves a 27.83% return, which is significantly higher than HNMVX's 24.90% return.

FCMVX

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 2.49%
• 6M: 18.72%
• YTD: 27.83%
• 1Y: 41.57%
• 3Y*: 42.88%
• 5Y*: 26.34%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.91%

HNMVX

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 4.16%
• 6M: 17.06%
• YTD: 24.90%
• 1Y: 40.06%
• 3Y*: 20.11%
• 5Y*: 13.70%
• 10Y*: 10.96%
• ALL TIME*: 11.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HNMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FCMVX vs. HNMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund	27.83%	12.62%	87.16%	23.07%	-10.26%	34.12%	0.52%	23.65%	-18.69%	12.67%
HNMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class	24.90%	16.06%	12.22%	16.52%	-5.58%	30.06%	-3.70%	23.06%	-17.76%	10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FCMVX and HNMVX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017	0.96

The correlation between FCMVX and HNMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCMVX vs. HNMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCMVX

FCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

HNMVX

HNMVX Risk / Return Rank: 97
HNMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
HNMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HNMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
HNMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HNMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCMVX vs. HNMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class (HNMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCMVX	HNMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	3.26	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	4.72	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.58	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.29	6.16	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.03	23.17	-6.15

FCMVX vs. HNMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the HNMVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCMVX and HNMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCMVX vs. HNMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCMVX drawdown since its inception was -44.63%, smaller than the maximum HNMVX drawdown of -51.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCMVX and HNMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCMVX	HNMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.63%	-51.33%	+6.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.21%	-6.84%	-3.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.56%	-21.00%	-17.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.56%	-21.00%	-17.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.35%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.19%	-7.02%	-2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	1.82%	+0.74%

Volatility

FCMVX vs. HNMVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class (HNMVX) at 3.04%. This indicates that FCMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HNMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCMVX	HNMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	3.04%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.24%	8.90%	+3.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.41%	12.98%	+3.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.59%	18.70%	+41.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.39%	21.85%	+25.54%

FCMVX vs. HNMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCMVX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HNMVX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCMVX vs. HNMVX - Dividend Comparison

FCMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than HNMVX's 7.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund	3.87%	6.68%	76.67%	1.29%	1.68%	1.39%	2.19%	1.68%	2.99%	0.77%	0.00%
HNMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class	7.02%	8.77%	5.87%	7.28%	8.35%	1.35%	2.43%	3.21%	8.52%	3.91%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCMVX and HNMVX in my portfolio?

FCMVX and HNMVX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCMVX or HNMVX?

FCMVX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to HNMVX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCMVX dropped -44.63% vs HNMVX's -51.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HNMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.