PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLSX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLSX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2040 Fund (FCLSX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCLSX achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 8.60% return.


FCLSX

1D
0.64%
1M
4.86%
YTD
12.51%
6M
13.87%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*

FSPGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.60%
6M
7.98%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLSX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2040 Fund
12.51%21.45%18.16%20.51%-17.74%16.91%18.37%25.92%-8.31%10.11%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
8.60%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%12.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLSX and FSPGX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.86

The correlation between FCLSX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLSX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLSX
FCLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FCLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLSX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2040 Fund (FCLSX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCLSXFSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.32

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.76

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.72

5.90

+8.82

FCLSX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLSX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCLSXFSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.85

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.75

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.90

-0.12

Drawdowns

FCLSX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLSX drawdown since its inception was -31.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLSX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLSXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.26%

-32.66%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-16.17%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.16%

-23.32%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.30%

-32.66%

+5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-6.37%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

4.81%

-2.86%

Volatility

FCLSX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2040 Fund (FCLSX) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 3.32%. This indicates that FCLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLSXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

3.32%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

11.58%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

15.39%

-4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

21.49%

-6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

21.55%

-5.80%

FCLSX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCLSX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FCLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2040 Fund
7.79%4.92%9.06%2.19%6.31%7.13%5.73%6.99%8.18%3.09%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.32%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCLSX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCLSX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to FSPGX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLSX dropped -31.26% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

FCLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLSX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer