FCLO vs. AGZD
FCLO (Fidelity CLO ETF) and AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Fidelity, while AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. FCLO is actively managed, while AGZD is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. FCLO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AGZD.
Performance
FCLO vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- 3.15%
FCLO vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 1.70% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLO and AGZD is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLO vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank
FCLO
AGZD
FCLO vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity CLO ETF (FCLO) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLO | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.96 | 0.64 | +3.32 |
Drawdowns
FCLO vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, smaller than the maximum AGZD drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLO and AGZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLO | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -8.46% | +7.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.39% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -0.77% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.28% | — |
Volatility
FCLO vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLO | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46% | 2.89% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 3.59% | -2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 3.72% | -2.26% |
FCLO vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLO vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison
FCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than AGZD's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.99% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLO and AGZD have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCLO.
AGZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 1.56% for FCLO.
FCLO is categorized as CLO, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCLO and 0.23% for AGZD.
Find the right allocation for FCLO and AGZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer