PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLD vs. SHOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLD vs. SHOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCLD achieves a 26.49% return, which is significantly lower than SHOC's 68.19% return.


FCLD

1D
-1.44%
1M
5.37%
YTD
26.49%
6M
25.09%
1Y
36.88%
3Y*
25.90%
5Y*
10Y*

SHOC

1D
-7.43%
1M
7.16%
YTD
68.19%
6M
66.31%
1Y
131.94%
3Y*
52.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLD vs. SHOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FCLD
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
26.49%8.19%21.80%53.05%-3.91%
SHOC
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
68.19%49.91%16.74%61.97%-1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLD and SHOC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022

0.66

The correlation between FCLD and SHOC shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLD vs. SHOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLD
FCLD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FCLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLD Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SHOC
SHOC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SHOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHOC Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SHOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHOC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLD vs. SHOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCLDSHOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.53

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

9.09

-6.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.32

31.95

-26.63

FCLD vs. SHOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the SHOC Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLD and SHOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCLD vs. SHOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLD drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, which is greater than SHOC's maximum drawdown of -37.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLD and SHOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLDSHOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.85%

-37.54%

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.48%

-14.59%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.80%

-37.54%

+2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.76%

-7.43%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.36%

-7.44%

-12.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.95%

4.15%

+2.80%

Volatility

FCLD vs. SHOC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) is 12.64%, while Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) has a volatility of 19.00%. This indicates that FCLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLDSHOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.64%

19.00%

-6.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.01%

29.24%

-6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.36%

35.72%

-7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.54%

36.06%

-5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.54%

36.06%

-5.52%

FCLD vs. SHOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SHOC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCLD vs. SHOC - Dividend Comparison

FCLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SHOC's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FCLD
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
0.01%0.03%0.13%0.17%0.26%0.13%
SHOC
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
0.14%0.23%0.35%0.65%0.24%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCLD and SHOC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHOC has higher volatility (19.00%) compared to FCLD (12.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLD dropped -50.85% vs SHOC's -37.54%.

On 3-year performance, SHOC leads with 52.16% vs 25.90% for FCLD. On fees, FCLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FCLD has been the lower-risk option at 12.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SHOC has performed better with a 52.16% return vs 25.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SHOC.

SHOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.01% for FCLD.

FCLD is categorized as Technology Equities, while SHOC is Semiconductors. FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SHOC tracks Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FCLD and 0.40% for SHOC.

SHOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLD and SHOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer