FCIV.TO vs. PID.TO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FCIV.TO (Fidelity International Value ETF) and PID.TO (Purpose International Dividend Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FCIV.TO is passively managed, while PID.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCIV.TO returned 16.79%/yr vs 15.17%/yr for PID.TO. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FCIV.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PID.TO.

Performance

FCIV.TO vs. PID.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) and Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIV.TO achieves a 21.38% return, which is significantly higher than PID.TO's 17.77% return.

FCIV.TO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.83%
• 6M: 10.82%
• YTD: 21.38%
• 1Y: 36.56%
• 3Y*: 22.55%
• 5Y*: 16.79%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.34%

PID.TO

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 1.57%
• 6M: 12.71%
• YTD: 17.77%
• 1Y: 35.02%
• 3Y*: 22.89%
• 5Y*: 15.17%
• 10Y*: 10.73%
• ALL TIME*: 9.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCIV.TO Fidelity International Value ETF	CA$1.12M	CA$1.36M	CA$2.02M
PID.TO Purpose International Dividend Fund	CA$137.31K	CA$154.29K	CA$193.57K

FCIV.TO vs. PID.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCIV.TO Fidelity International Value ETF	21.38%	33.60%	6.89%	22.75%	-0.22%	14.15%	4.49%
PID.TO Purpose International Dividend Fund	17.77%	33.43%	13.85%	15.75%	-2.67%	7.76%	3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIV.TO and PID.TO is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020	0.67

The correlation between FCIV.TO and PID.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCIV.TO vs. PID.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCIV.TO	PID.TO
Financial Services	31.0%	39.7%
Energy	11.8%	4.8%
Industrials	11.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	10.1%	5.4%
Real Estate	8.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	8.8%
Technology	6.5%	2.3%
Healthcare	3.2%	10.8%
Communication Services	1.2%	5.6%
Basic Materials	-	8.3%
Utilities	-	6.3%

Return for Risk

FCIV.TO vs. PID.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCIV.TO

FCIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FCIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FCIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FCIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FCIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

PID.TO

PID.TO Risk / Return Rank: 87
PID.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PID.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PID.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PID.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PID.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCIV.TO vs. PID.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) and Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCIV.TO	PID.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	2.39	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.28	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.44	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.18	3.12	+1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.74	12.05	+3.69

FCIV.TO vs. PID.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the PID.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIV.TO and PID.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCIV.TO vs. PID.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, smaller than the maximum PID.TO drawdown of -27.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIV.TO and PID.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCIV.TO	PID.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.27%	-27.27%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-11.09%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.59%	-12.35%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.27%	-20.07%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.86%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-4.11%	+0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	2.86%	-0.58%

Volatility

FCIV.TO vs. PID.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) is 3.97%, while Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that FCIV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PID.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCIV.TO	PID.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	4.45%	-0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.17%	12.23%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	14.48%	+0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.26%	12.51%	+2.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.47%	13.80%	+1.67%

FCIV.TO vs. PID.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIV.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PID.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCIV.TO vs. PID.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than PID.TO's 2.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCIV.TO Fidelity International Value ETF	2.06%	2.09%	2.80%	3.64%	3.45%	2.97%	0.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PID.TO Purpose International Dividend Fund	2.69%	3.12%	4.02%	4.39%	4.86%	4.50%	4.64%	4.28%	4.67%	3.53%	3.49%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCIV.TO and PID.TO in my portfolio?

FCIV.TO and PID.TO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCIV.TO or PID.TO?

On fees, FCIV.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCIV.TO or PID.TO?

FCIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PID.TO.

What is the main difference between FCIV.TO and PID.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCIV.TO and 0.65% for PID.TO.