PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCIV.TO vs. FXM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCIV.TO vs. FXM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIV.TO achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than FXM.TO's 15.85% return.


FCIV.TO

1D
0.66%
1M
2.10%
YTD
12.74%
6M
10.78%
1Y
31.00%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
14.84%
10Y*

FXM.TO

1D
0.35%
1M
4.43%
YTD
15.85%
6M
18.70%
1Y
49.87%
3Y*
28.52%
5Y*
18.45%
10Y*
14.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCIV.TO vs. FXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FCIV.TO
Fidelity International Value ETF
12.74%33.59%6.89%22.74%-0.22%14.15%5.34%
FXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF
15.85%38.54%30.05%5.79%-1.19%31.47%14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIV.TO and FXM.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020

0.51

The correlation between FCIV.TO and FXM.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCIV.TO vs. FXM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCIV.TO
FXM.TO

Financial Services

30.7%
18.0%

Industrials

13.6%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

13.3%
6.3%

Energy

12.9%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
10.2%

Real Estate

9.1%

-

Technology

5.6%
5.7%

Healthcare

3.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

15.4%

Communication Services

-

12.0%

Utilities

-

13.2%

Financial Services

FCIV.TO
30.7%
FXM.TO
18.0%

Industrials

FCIV.TO
13.6%
FXM.TO
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

FCIV.TO
13.3%
FXM.TO
6.3%

Energy

FCIV.TO
12.9%
FXM.TO
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FCIV.TO
11.2%
FXM.TO
10.2%

Real Estate

FCIV.TO
9.1%
FXM.TO

-

Technology

FCIV.TO
5.6%
FXM.TO
5.7%

Healthcare

FCIV.TO
3.7%
FXM.TO

-

Basic Materials

FCIV.TO

-

FXM.TO
15.4%

Communication Services

FCIV.TO

-

FXM.TO
12.0%

Utilities

FCIV.TO

-

FXM.TO
13.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCIV.TO vs. FXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCIV.TO
FCIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FXM.TO
FXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIV.TO vs. FXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCIV.TOFXM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.91

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

6.18

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

24.59

-10.93

FCIV.TO vs. FXM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIV.TO and FXM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCIV.TOFXM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

4.60

-2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.30

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.82

+0.18

Drawdowns

FCIV.TO vs. FXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, smaller than the maximum FXM.TO drawdown of -46.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIV.TO and FXM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCIV.TOFXM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.27%

-46.41%

+22.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-8.11%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.59%

-12.44%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.27%

-16.08%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

0.00%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-4.69%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

2.03%

+0.25%

Volatility

FCIV.TO vs. FXM.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) at 1.58%. This indicates that FCIV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCIV.TOFXM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

1.58%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

8.28%

+3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

10.90%

+3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

14.25%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

16.99%

-1.45%

FCIV.TO vs. FXM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIV.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FXM.TO's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCIV.TO vs. FXM.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than FXM.TO's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCIV.TO
Fidelity International Value ETF
1.84%2.08%2.80%3.63%3.45%2.97%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF
1.82%1.91%2.17%2.96%2.18%2.19%2.40%2.03%2.52%1.70%1.83%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCIV.TO and FXM.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCIV.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXM.TO.

FCIV.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FXM.TO is Canada Equities. FCIV.TO tracks Fidelity Canada International Value Index, while FXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and CI Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCIV.TO and 0.64% for FXM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCIV.TO and FXM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer