FCIV.TO vs. FEQT.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCIV.TO (Fidelity International Value ETF) and FEQT.NEO (Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FCIV.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada International Value Index, while FEQT.NEO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Fidelity. FCIV.TO is passively managed, while FEQT.NEO is actively managed. Over the past year, FCIV.TO returned 29.97% vs 24.74% for FEQT.NEO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCIV.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FEQT.NEO.

Performance

FCIV.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIV.TO achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly higher than FEQT.NEO's 10.30% return.

FCIV.TO

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 12.00%
• 6M: 10.11%
• 1Y: 29.97%
• 3Y*: 21.68%
• 5Y*: 14.69%
• 10Y*: —

FEQT.NEO

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 4.01%
• YTD: 10.30%
• 6M: 10.63%
• 1Y: 24.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCIV.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FCIV.TO Fidelity International Value ETF	12.00%	33.59%	-2.00%
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund	10.30%	19.42%	14.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIV.TO and FEQT.NEO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024	0.70

The correlation between FCIV.TO and FEQT.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCIV.TO vs. FEQT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCIV.TO

FCIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 64
FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FCIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FCIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FCIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FCIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FEQT.NEO

FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 66
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIV.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCIV.TO	FEQT.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	2.26	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	3.17	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.42	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	2.99	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.21	12.96	+0.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCIV.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIV.TO and FEQT.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCIV.TO	FEQT.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	2.26	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	1.77	-0.77

Drawdowns

FCIV.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, which is greater than FEQT.NEO's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIV.TO and FEQT.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCIV.TO	FEQT.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.27%	-13.24%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-8.31%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.73%	-1.02%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-1.45%	-2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	1.91%	+0.36%

Volatility

FCIV.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) at 3.89%. This indicates that FCIV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEQT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCIV.TO	FEQT.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.21%	3.89%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.85%	8.88%	+2.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.49%	11.01%	+3.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	12.45%	+2.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.54%	12.45%	+3.09%

FCIV.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIV.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQT.NEO's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCIV.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FCIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than FEQT.NEO's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCIV.TO Fidelity International Value ETF	1.85%	2.08%	2.80%	3.63%	3.45%	2.97%	0.90%
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund	0.82%	0.91%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCIV.TO and FEQT.NEO in my portfolio?

FCIV.TO and FEQT.NEO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCIV.TO or FEQT.NEO?

On fees, FEQT.NEO is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCIV.TO or FEQT.NEO?

FEQT.NEO is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCIV.TO.

What is the main difference between FCIV.TO and FEQT.NEO?

FCIV.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FEQT.NEO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCIV.TO and 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.