FCIFX vs. URTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX).
FCIFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 24, 2003. URTRX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jul 30, 2008.
Performance
FCIFX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCIFX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCIFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I | 0.27% | 11.27% | 5.19% | 9.55% | -13.19% | 5.44% | 10.90% | 14.74% | -3.44% | 12.26% |
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 0.38% | 14.78% | 8.09% | 13.98% | -13.23% | 12.23% | 9.25% | 17.13% | -6.98% | 16.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCIFX achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than URTRX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FCIFX has underperformed URTRX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while URTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.49% annualized return.
FCIFX
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
URTRX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 13.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCIFX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCIFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCIFX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank
FCIFX
URTRX
FCIFX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCIFX | URTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 1.58 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 2.25 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.11 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.01 | 9.81 | -0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCIFX | URTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.58 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.60 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.73 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.58 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCIFX and URTRX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCIFX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison
FCIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, less than URTRX's 6.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCIFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I | 5.14% | 5.15% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 7.32% | 9.05% | 6.04% | 5.98% | 9.07% | 6.67% | 4.58% | 4.02% |
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 6.75% | 6.78% | 3.16% | 4.24% | 9.53% | 7.66% | 4.53% | 11.43% | 8.54% | 8.10% | 4.06% | 2.80% |
Drawdowns
FCIFX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCIFX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than URTRX's maximum drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIFX and URTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCIFX | URTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.09% | -34.10% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.03% | -6.63% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.34% | -19.52% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.34% | -23.56% | +5.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -3.84% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -4.19% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 1.43% | -0.42% |
Volatility
FCIFX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) is 2.69%, while USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that FCIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCIFX | URTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 3.55% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.68% | 5.46% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.60% | 8.89% | -3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.34% | 9.67% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.34% | 10.33% | -3.99% |