FCIFX vs. URTRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCIFX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I) and URTRX (USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FCIFX returned 5.74%/yr vs 8.01%/yr for URTRX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCIFX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for URTRX.

Performance

FCIFX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIFX achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly lower than URTRX's 8.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FCIFX has underperformed URTRX with an annualized return of 5.74%, while URTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.01% annualized return.

FCIFX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.76%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 12.03%
• 3Y*: 8.87%
• 5Y*: 3.56%
• 10Y*: 5.74%

URTRX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 8.16%
• 6M: 8.62%
• 1Y: 18.02%
• 3Y*: 13.15%
• 5Y*: 6.58%
• 10Y*: 8.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCIFX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCIFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I	5.00%	11.27%	5.19%	9.55%	-13.19%	5.44%	10.90%	14.74%	-3.44%	12.26%
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund	8.16%	14.78%	8.09%	13.98%	-13.23%	12.23%	9.25%	17.13%	-6.98%	16.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIFX and URTRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2008	0.93

The correlation between FCIFX and URTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCIFX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCIFX

FCIFX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FCIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FCIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FCIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FCIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FCIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

URTRX

URTRX Risk / Return Rank: 77
URTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
URTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
URTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
URTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
URTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIFX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCIFX	URTRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.54	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	3.67	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.48	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	3.44	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.95	14.88	-1.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCIFX vs. URTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the URTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIFX and URTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCIFX	URTRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.54	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.68	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.78	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.61	-0.04

Drawdowns

FCIFX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIFX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than URTRX's maximum drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIFX and URTRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCIFX	URTRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.09%	-34.10%	-3.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.03%	-5.29%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.78%	-9.12%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.34%	-19.52%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.34%	-23.56%	+5.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-4.15%	+0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.22%	-0.29%

Volatility

FCIFX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) is 1.99%, while USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that FCIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCIFX	URTRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	2.54%	-0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.26%	5.81%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.02%	7.15%	-2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.39%	9.69%	-3.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.36%	10.35%	-3.99%

FCIFX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCIFX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison

FCIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than URTRX's 6.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCIFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I	5.05%	5.15%	2.72%	2.62%	7.32%	9.05%	6.04%	5.98%	9.07%	6.67%	4.58%	4.02%
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund	6.27%	6.78%	3.16%	4.24%	9.53%	7.66%	4.53%	11.43%	8.54%	8.10%	4.06%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCIFX and URTRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FCIFX and URTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCIFX or URTRX?

URTRX has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to FCIFX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCIFX dropped -38.09% vs URTRX's -34.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.