PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCIFX vs. PDAHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCIFX vs. PDAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) and Prudential Day One Income Fund (PDAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCIFX having a 4.10% return and PDAHX slightly higher at 4.27%.


FCIFX

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.35%
YTD
4.10%
6M
3.88%
1Y
9.57%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*
5.84%

PDAHX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
4.27%
6M
3.87%
1Y
9.93%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCIFX vs. PDAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCIFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I
4.10%11.27%5.19%9.55%-13.19%5.44%10.90%14.74%-3.44%12.26%
PDAHX
Prudential Day One Income Fund
4.27%10.37%8.27%8.89%-11.69%9.21%8.22%13.58%-3.26%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIFX and PDAHX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.90

The correlation between FCIFX and PDAHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCIFX vs. PDAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCIFX
FCIFX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FCIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PDAHX
PDAHX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PDAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PDAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIFX vs. PDAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) and Prudential Day One Income Fund (PDAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCIFXPDAHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.90

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.70

13.43

-2.73

FCIFX vs. PDAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the PDAHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIFX and PDAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCIFX vs. PDAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIFX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than PDAHX's maximum drawdown of -15.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIFX and PDAHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCIFXPDAHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.09%

-15.65%

-22.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-3.51%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.78%

-5.61%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.34%

-15.65%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-1.09%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-2.66%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.76%

+0.19%

Volatility

FCIFX vs. PDAHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Prudential Day One Income Fund (PDAHX) at 1.74%. This indicates that FCIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCIFXPDAHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

1.74%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.79%

3.74%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.48%

4.62%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.47%

6.57%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

6.39%

-0.04%

FCIFX vs. PDAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PDAHX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCIFX vs. PDAHX - Dividend Comparison

FCIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than PDAHX's 4.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCIFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I
5.09%5.15%2.72%2.62%7.32%9.05%6.04%5.98%9.07%6.67%4.58%4.02%
PDAHX
Prudential Day One Income Fund
4.88%4.92%7.35%3.54%7.78%7.72%2.22%4.25%3.70%1.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FCIFX and PDAHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCIFX has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to PDAHX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCIFX dropped -38.09% vs PDAHX's -15.65%.

PDAHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCIFX and PDAHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer