PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCIFX vs. FYTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCIFX vs. FYTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6 (FYTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCIFX having a 5.00% return and FYTKX slightly higher at 5.05%.


FCIFX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.76%
YTD
5.00%
6M
5.31%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
5.74%

FYTKX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.73%
YTD
5.05%
6M
5.40%
1Y
11.76%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCIFX vs. FYTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCIFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I
5.00%11.27%5.19%9.55%-13.19%5.44%10.90%14.74%-3.44%5.40%
FYTKX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6
5.05%10.61%4.60%8.42%-11.23%3.25%9.07%10.71%-1.84%3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIFX and FYTKX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.93

The correlation between FCIFX and FYTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCIFX vs. FYTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCIFX
FCIFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FCIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FYTKX
FYTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FYTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FYTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIFX vs. FYTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6 (FYTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCIFXFYTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.55

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.26

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.95

14.40

-1.45

FCIFX vs. FYTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FYTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIFX and FYTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCIFXFYTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.63

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.65

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.95

-0.38

Drawdowns

FCIFX vs. FYTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIFX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than FYTKX's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIFX and FYTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCIFXFYTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.09%

-15.80%

-22.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-3.67%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.78%

-4.85%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.34%

-15.80%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-2.88%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.83%

+0.10%

Volatility

FCIFX vs. FYTKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6 (FYTKX) at 1.86%. This indicates that FCIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCIFXFYTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

1.86%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.26%

3.85%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.02%

4.54%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

5.34%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.36%

4.76%

+1.60%

FCIFX vs. FYTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FYTKX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCIFX vs. FYTKX - Dividend Comparison

FCIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than FYTKX's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCIFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I
5.05%5.15%2.72%2.62%7.32%9.05%6.04%5.98%9.07%6.67%4.58%4.02%
FYTKX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6
3.20%3.53%3.38%3.13%6.05%6.26%4.48%3.80%5.33%2.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FCIFX and FYTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCIFX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to FYTKX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCIFX dropped -38.09% vs FYTKX's -15.80%.

FYTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCIFX and FYTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer