FCID.TO vs. ZDIV.TO
FCID.TO (Fidelity International High Dividend ETF) and ZDIV.TO (BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Dividend funds - FCID.TO tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Dividend Index while ZDIV.TO tracks the MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCID.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZDIV.TO.
Performance
FCID.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCID.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- 1Y
- 26.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
ZDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCID.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCID.TO Fidelity International High Dividend ETF | 2.52% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 15.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCID.TO and ZDIV.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCID.TO vs. ZDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCID.TO
ZDIV.TO
FCID.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF (ZDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCID.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCID.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 5.66 | -5.12 |
Drawdowns
FCID.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCID.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, which is greater than ZDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCID.TO and ZDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCID.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -2.60% | -31.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -1.02% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -0.49% | -5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | — | — |
Volatility
FCID.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCID.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65% | 9.99% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 9.99% | +3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 9.99% | +6.75% |
FCID.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCID.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDIV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCID.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCID.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than ZDIV.TO's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCID.TO Fidelity International High Dividend ETF | 3.39% | 3.61% | 4.16% | 4.49% | 5.08% | 3.30% | 3.78% | 3.82% | 0.44% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCID.TO and ZDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCID.TO.
FCID.TO tracks Fidelity Canada International High Dividend Index, while ZDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCID.TO and 0.09% for ZDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for FCID.TO and ZDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer