FCHKX vs. FHKIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX).
FCHKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. FHKIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
FCHKX vs. FHKIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCHKX vs. FHKIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCHKX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C | 5.23% | 41.13% | 21.90% | -1.27% | -24.66% | -14.60% | 46.29% | 33.74% | -18.29% | 50.37% |
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I | 5.50% | 42.60% | 23.15% | -0.28% | -23.85% | -13.71% | 47.80% | 35.11% | -17.43% | 51.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCHKX achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than FHKIX's 5.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FCHKX has underperformed FHKIX with an annualized return of 11.00%, while FHKIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.
FCHKX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 42.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
FHKIX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -9.04%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 43.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCHKX vs. FHKIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCHKX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKIX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCHKX vs. FHKIX — Risk / Return Rank
FCHKX
FHKIX
FCHKX vs. FHKIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCHKX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 1.87 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.34 | 2.41 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.51 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.31 | 9.74 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCHKX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 1.87 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.12 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.55 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.33 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCHKX and FHKIX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCHKX vs. FHKIX - Dividend Comparison
FCHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than FHKIX's 1.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCHKX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C | 0.83% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 11.31% | 4.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I | 1.74% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 1.89% | 1.04% | 10.81% | 4.90% | 0.65% | 0.79% | 0.44% | 1.40% | 15.62% |
Drawdowns
FCHKX vs. FHKIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCHKX drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, roughly equal to the maximum FHKIX drawdown of -58.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCHKX and FHKIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCHKX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.14% | -58.42% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.97% | -15.94% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.57% | -53.83% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.14% | -58.42% | -0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.88% | -10.80% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.52% | -18.84% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 4.11% | +0.04% |
Volatility
FCHKX vs. FHKIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) have volatilities of 9.28% and 9.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCHKX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 9.27% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.44% | 16.45% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.15% | 23.16% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 23.95% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 22.09% | 0.00% |