FCGLX vs. LTIUX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCGLX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6) and LTIUX (Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FCGLX returned 10.07%/yr vs 7.01%/yr for LTIUX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FCGLX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTIUX.

Performance

FCGLX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6 (FCGLX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCGLX achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly higher than LTIUX's 6.70% return.

FCGLX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 4.67%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 6M: 14.07%
• 1Y: 28.47%
• 3Y*: 20.11%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: —

LTIUX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: 17.03%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 7.01%
• 10Y*: 9.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCGLX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCGLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6	12.42%	23.32%	13.97%	19.59%	-17.89%	16.33%	17.80%	26.90%	-7.96%	9.42%
LTIUX Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund	6.70%	14.26%	14.13%	16.51%	-17.48%	14.07%	15.70%	23.48%	-7.37%	9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FCGLX and LTIUX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017	0.96

The correlation between FCGLX and LTIUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCGLX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCGLX

FCGLX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FCGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FCGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FCGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FCGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FCGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

LTIUX

LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 50
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCGLX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6 (FCGLX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCGLX	LTIUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.03	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	2.91	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.38	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	2.66	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.12	11.84	+1.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCGLX vs. LTIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the LTIUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCGLX and LTIUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCGLX	LTIUX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	2.03	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.60	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.48	+0.26

Drawdowns

FCGLX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCGLX drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum LTIUX drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGLX and LTIUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCGLX	LTIUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.21%	-49.65%	+18.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-6.57%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.03%	-11.08%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.13%	-24.23%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-6.71%	+1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	1.47%	+0.72%

Volatility

FCGLX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6 (FCGLX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) at 2.62%. This indicates that FCGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCGLX	LTIUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	2.62%	+1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	6.96%	+3.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.53%	8.62%	+3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.96%	11.83%	+3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.02%	12.49%	+3.53%

FCGLX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCGLX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LTIUX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCGLX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison

FCGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, less than LTIUX's 8.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCGLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6	7.27%	6.53%	1.92%	1.75%	11.04%	9.87%	5.57%	7.30%	12.13%	3.56%	0.00%	0.00%
LTIUX Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund	8.46%	9.03%	9.46%	4.17%	7.50%	7.06%	5.35%	7.28%	7.75%	5.46%	4.28%	5.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCGLX and LTIUX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FCGLX and LTIUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCGLX or LTIUX?

FCGLX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to LTIUX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCGLX dropped -31.21% vs LTIUX's -49.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.