FCGLX vs. FFSZX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FCGLX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6) and FFSZX (Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FCGLX returned 9.84%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for FFSZX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

FCGLX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6 (FCGLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCGLX achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 13.82% return.

FCGLX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 12.22%
• 6M: 13.50%
• 1Y: 27.59%
• 3Y*: 20.18%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: —

FFSZX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.76%
• YTD: 13.82%
• 6M: 15.32%
• 1Y: 30.98%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCGLX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCGLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6	12.22%	23.32%	13.97%	19.59%	-17.89%	16.33%	17.80%	8.78%
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6	13.82%	24.08%	14.41%	20.78%	-18.05%	16.81%	18.36%	9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FCGLX and FFSZX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019	0.99

The correlation between FCGLX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCGLX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCGLX

FCGLX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FCGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FCGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FCGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FCGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FCGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FFSZX

FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCGLX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6 (FCGLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCGLX	FFSZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.43	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	3.35	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.45	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	3.17	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.68	14.19	-1.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCGLX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCGLX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCGLX	FFSZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	2.43	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.70	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.80	-0.06

Drawdowns

FCGLX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCGLX drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, roughly equal to the maximum FFSZX drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGLX and FFSZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCGLX	FFSZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.21%	-31.00%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-9.77%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.03%	-15.36%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.13%	-27.17%	+0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-0.11%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-5.80%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.18%	+0.01%

Volatility

FCGLX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6 (FCGLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) have volatilities of 4.10% and 4.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCGLX	FFSZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	4.21%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.28%	10.55%	-0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.55%	12.77%	-0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.95%	15.01%	-0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.02%	17.04%	-1.02%

FCGLX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCGLX and FFSZX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

FCGLX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

FCGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than FFSZX's 5.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCGLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6	7.28%	6.53%	1.92%	1.75%	11.04%	9.87%	5.57%	7.30%	12.13%	3.56%
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6	5.03%	3.82%	2.92%	2.26%	8.99%	7.98%	2.41%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCGLX and FFSZX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FCGLX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCGLX or FFSZX?

FFSZX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to FCGLX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCGLX dropped -31.21% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.