FCGCX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FCGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FCGCX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCGCX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C | 22.54% | 27.29% | 1.90% | -6.06% | 19.45% | 24.85% | 4.96% | 16.74% | -14.07% | 17.33% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | -1.94% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCGCX achieves a 22.54% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's -1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FCGCX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 12.80%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.65% annualized return.
FCGCX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 22.54%
- 6M
- 30.53%
- 1Y
- 50.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCGCX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCGCX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCGCX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FCGCX
FSPSX
FCGCX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 1.11 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 1.56 | +1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.23 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 1.54 | +1.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.14 | 5.93 | +11.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 1.11 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.51 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.53 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.46 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCGCX and FSPSX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCGCX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FCGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than FSPSX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C | 1.21% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 0.80% | 1.09% | 2.41% | 0.59% | 1.94% | 1.11% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.49% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FCGCX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCGCX drawdown since its inception was -59.67%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGCX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.67% | -33.69% | -25.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.67% | -11.39% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.43% | -29.41% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.31% | -33.69% | -15.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -10.86% | +8.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.40% | -6.59% | -14.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.96% | -0.10% |
Volatility
FCGCX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) is 6.10%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that FCGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 7.04% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.75% | 10.63% | +3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.52% | 16.79% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 15.77% | +5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 16.47% | +6.07% |