FCGCX vs. FFGCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX).
FCGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. FFGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009.
Performance
FCGCX vs. FFGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCGCX vs. FFGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C | 22.54% | 27.29% | 1.90% | -6.06% | 19.45% | 24.85% | 4.96% | 16.74% | -14.07% | 17.33% |
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 22.87% | 28.66% | 2.98% | -5.18% | 20.69% | 26.08% | 6.04% | 17.82% | -13.21% | 17.18% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCGCX having a 22.54% return and FFGCX slightly higher at 22.87%. Over the past 10 years, FCGCX has underperformed FFGCX with an annualized return of 12.80%, while FFGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.82% annualized return.
FCGCX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 22.54%
- 6M
- 30.53%
- 1Y
- 50.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
FFGCX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 31.25%
- 1Y
- 52.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCGCX vs. FFGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCGCX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGCX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCGCX vs. FFGCX — Risk / Return Rank
FCGCX
FFGCX
FCGCX vs. FFGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCGCX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 2.57 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 3.09 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.49 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.46 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.14 | 17.89 | -0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCGCX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.57 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.74 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.62 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.35 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCGCX and FFGCX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCGCX vs. FFGCX - Dividend Comparison
FCGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than FFGCX's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C | 1.21% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 0.80% | 1.09% | 2.41% | 0.59% | 1.94% | 1.11% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.49% |
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 2.06% | 2.53% | 2.62% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.39% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 2.22% | 0.36% | 1.53% | 2.86% |
Drawdowns
FCGCX vs. FFGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCGCX drawdown since its inception was -59.67%, roughly equal to the maximum FFGCX drawdown of -57.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGCX and FFGCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCGCX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.67% | -57.23% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.67% | -14.64% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.43% | -27.22% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.31% | -48.43% | -0.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -2.30% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.40% | -19.54% | -1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.83% | +0.03% |
Volatility
FCGCX vs. FFGCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) have volatilities of 6.10% and 6.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCGCX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 6.10% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.75% | 13.74% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.52% | 20.49% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 21.53% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 22.54% | 0.00% |