FCGCX vs. BCSKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX).
FCGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. BCSKX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. It was launched on Oct 3, 2011.
Performance
FCGCX vs. BCSKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCGCX vs. BCSKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C | 23.83% | 27.29% | 1.90% | -6.06% | 19.45% | 24.85% | 4.96% | 16.74% | -19.37% |
BCSKX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K | 20.37% | 28.88% | 4.44% | -4.27% | 11.95% | 22.49% | 6.84% | 3.89% | 2.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCGCX achieves a 23.83% return, which is significantly higher than BCSKX's 20.37% return.
FCGCX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- 23.83%
- 6M
- 32.65%
- 1Y
- 51.37%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 14.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.92%
BCSKX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 20.37%
- 6M
- 27.67%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 14.27%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCGCX vs. BCSKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCGCX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BCSKX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCGCX vs. BCSKX — Risk / Return Rank
FCGCX
BCSKX
FCGCX vs. BCSKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCGCX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 2.63 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.08 | 3.31 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.47 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 4.07 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.25 | 20.58 | -2.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCGCX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.63 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.91 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.76 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCGCX and BCSKX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCGCX vs. BCSKX - Dividend Comparison
FCGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than BCSKX's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 0.80% | 1.09% | 2.41% | 0.59% | 1.94% | 1.11% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.49% |
BCSKX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K | 2.60% | 3.13% | 3.66% | 9.45% | 9.11% | 2.72% | 0.84% | 2.08% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCGCX vs. BCSKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCGCX drawdown since its inception was -59.67%, which is greater than BCSKX's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGCX and BCSKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCGCX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.67% | -30.34% | -29.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.67% | -10.51% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.43% | -22.34% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -0.40% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.40% | -6.67% | -14.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.08% | +0.78% |
Volatility
FCGCX vs. BCSKX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) at 4.47%. This indicates that FCGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCSKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCGCX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 4.47% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.77% | 12.36% | +1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.50% | 16.15% | +4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 15.80% | +5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 15.08% | +7.46% |