FCFY vs. OILK
FCFY (First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCFY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Sector-Neutral FCF Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FCFY returned 20.70% vs 58.99% for OILK. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. FCFY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
FCFY vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCFY achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
FCFY
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 20.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FCFY vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF | 3.09% | 16.76% | 11.28% | 11.06% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -3.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCFY and OILK is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2023 | -0.02 |
The correlation between FCFY and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCFY vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCFY
OILK
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
FCFY
OILK
-
Financial Services
FCFY
OILK
-
Communication Services
FCFY
OILK
-
Healthcare
FCFY
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
FCFY
OILK
Industrials
FCFY
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
FCFY
OILK
-
Energy
FCFY
OILK
-
Utilities
FCFY
OILK
-
Real Estate
FCFY
OILK
-
Basic Materials
FCFY
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCFY vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
FCFY
OILK
FCFY vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCFY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.34 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 3.42 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | 6.91 | -2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCFY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 2.06 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.12 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
FCFY vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCFY drawdown since its inception was -21.36%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFY and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCFY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.36% | -83.76% | +62.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -17.35% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -3.66% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -32.61% | +29.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 8.56% | -4.09% |
Volatility
FCFY vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) is 4.72%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that FCFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCFY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 10.44% | -5.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.29% | 23.26% | -11.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 28.75% | -12.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 30.12% | -12.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 35.97% | -18.43% |
FCFY vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCFY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCFY vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
FCFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.43% | 1.48% | 1.76% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCFY and OILK have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to FCFY (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFY dropped -21.36% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 58.99% vs 20.70% for FCFY. On fees, FCFY is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FCFY has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 58.99% return vs 20.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCFY is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.43% for FCFY.
FCFY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. FCFY tracks S&P 500 Sector-Neutral FCF Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FCFY and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCFY and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer