PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCFY vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCFY vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFY achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than ILCV's 7.75% return.


FCFY

1D
-1.02%
1M
5.88%
YTD
3.09%
6M
4.54%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ILCV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.76%
YTD
7.75%
6M
7.41%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFY vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FCFY
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF
3.09%16.76%11.28%11.06%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
7.75%18.79%17.03%8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFY and ILCV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2023

0.86

The correlation between FCFY and ILCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCFY vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCFY
ILCV

Technology

37.4%
23.8%

Financial Services

11.5%
16.5%

Communication Services

10.3%
8.0%

Healthcare

10.1%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.5%

Industrials

5.8%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
7.6%

Energy

4.0%
6.0%

Utilities

2.5%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.4%

Technology

FCFY
37.4%
ILCV
23.8%

Financial Services

FCFY
11.5%
ILCV
16.5%

Communication Services

FCFY
10.3%
ILCV
8.0%

Healthcare

FCFY
10.1%
ILCV
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FCFY
9.8%
ILCV
9.5%

Industrials

FCFY
5.8%
ILCV
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

FCFY
5.1%
ILCV
7.6%

Energy

FCFY
4.0%
ILCV
6.0%

Utilities

FCFY
2.5%
ILCV
3.5%

Real Estate

FCFY
1.9%
ILCV
2.0%

Basic Materials

FCFY
1.7%
ILCV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCFY vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFY
FCFY Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FCFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFY Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFY vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCFYILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.50

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

4.08

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

16.87

-12.23

FCFY vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFY Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFY and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCFYILCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

2.72

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.46

+0.42

Drawdowns

FCFY vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFY drawdown since its inception was -21.36%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFY and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCFYILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.36%

-58.63%

+37.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-6.55%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-0.60%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-9.32%

+5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

1.58%

+2.89%

Volatility

FCFY vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.01%. This indicates that FCFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCFYILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

2.01%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

6.97%

+4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

9.82%

+6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

14.21%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

16.66%

+0.88%

FCFY vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCFY vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

FCFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than ILCV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCFY
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF
1.43%1.48%1.76%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.63%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCFY and ILCV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCFY has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to ILCV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFY dropped -21.36% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 1-year performance, ILCV leads with 26.58% vs 20.70% for FCFY. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 26.58% return vs 20.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FCFY.

ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.43% for FCFY.

FCFY tracks S&P 500 Sector-Neutral FCF Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FCFY and 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCFY and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer