PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCFWX vs. ABALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCFWX vs. ABALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio Enhanced Class F-1 (FCFWX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFWX achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than ABALX's 9.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFWX has underperformed ABALX with an annualized return of 8.49%, while ABALX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.


FCFWX

1D
0.25%
1M
2.59%
YTD
7.49%
6M
8.14%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
8.49%

ABALX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.97%
YTD
9.98%
6M
10.60%
1Y
24.98%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFWX vs. ABALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCFWX
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio Enhanced Class F-1
7.49%17.19%11.58%11.90%-11.04%15.09%7.03%17.72%-5.01%13.67%
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
9.98%18.45%14.63%13.65%-12.13%15.75%10.85%18.60%-3.35%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFWX and ABALX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.96

The correlation between FCFWX and ABALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCFWX vs. ABALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFWX
FCFWX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FCFWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ABALX
ABALX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ABALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ABALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFWX vs. ABALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio Enhanced Class F-1 (FCFWX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCFWXABALXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.54

2.94

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.61

4.11

-0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.56

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.64

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.28

16.45

-3.18

FCFWX vs. ABALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the ABALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFWX and ABALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCFWXABALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.94

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.93

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.95

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.81

+0.05

Drawdowns

FCFWX vs. ABALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFWX drawdown since its inception was -23.62%, smaller than the maximum ABALX drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFWX and ABALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCFWXABALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.62%

-40.20%

+16.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-7.03%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.19%

-10.68%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

-18.76%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.62%

-22.34%

-1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-3.85%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

1.55%

-0.12%

Volatility

FCFWX vs. ABALX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio Enhanced Class F-1 (FCFWX) is 2.27%, while American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that FCFWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCFWXABALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

2.65%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.02%

6.86%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.53%

8.71%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.48%

10.49%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.21%

10.67%

-0.46%

FCFWX vs. ABALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFWX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than ABALX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCFWX vs. ABALX - Dividend Comparison

FCFWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, less than ABALX's 7.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
7.54%8.27%6.87%2.05%2.30%4.30%4.35%3.49%5.49%4.72%4.24%5.60%
FCFWX
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio Enhanced Class F-1
5.33%5.71%2.99%3.26%5.52%4.22%2.85%3.99%4.26%2.64%2.85%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FCFWX and ABALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ABALX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to FCFWX (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFWX dropped -23.62% vs ABALX's -40.20%.

ABALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCFWX and ABALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer