FCFCX vs. URFFX

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

FCFCX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C) and URFFX (USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FCFCX returned 4.40%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for URFFX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCFCX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for URFFX.

Performance

FCFCX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C (FCFCX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFCX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than URFFX's 11.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFCX has underperformed URFFX with an annualized return of 4.40%, while URFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.

FCFCX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -1.39%
• 6M: 2.82%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 1Y: 7.29%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: 2.12%
• 10Y*: 4.40%
• ALL TIME*: 3.84%

URFFX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -0.75%
• 6M: 10.11%
• YTD: 11.62%
• 1Y: 21.40%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: 10.03%
• ALL TIME*: 8.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFCX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCFCX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C	3.28%	10.08%	4.12%	8.46%	-13.98%	4.41%	9.71%	13.61%	-4.20%	11.06%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	11.62%	19.35%	11.86%	18.12%	-15.66%	17.70%	10.52%	20.16%	-9.01%	19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFCX and URFFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008	0.91

The correlation between FCFCX and URFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (3 years) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCFCX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFCX

FCFCX Risk / Return Rank: 44
FCFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FCFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FCFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FCFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FCFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

URFFX

URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 76
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFCX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C (FCFCX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCFCX	URFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.86	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.62	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	2.77	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.57	11.81	-4.24

FCFCX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the URFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFCX and URFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCFCX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFCX drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, smaller than the maximum URFFX drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFCX and URFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCFCX	URFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.93%	-44.25%	+5.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.09%	-7.89%	+3.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.87%	-14.14%	+8.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.13%	-23.76%	+4.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.13%	-29.97%	+10.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.39%	-1.44%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-5.89%	+1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	1.84%	-0.84%

Volatility

FCFCX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C (FCFCX) is 1.85%, while USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that FCFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCFCX	URFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.85%	2.84%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.90%	9.78%	-4.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.54%	11.76%	-6.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.46%	13.96%	-7.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.29%	14.33%	-8.04%

FCFCX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFCX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCFCX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

FCFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than URFFX's 5.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCFCX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C	4.19%	4.17%	2.05%	1.54%	6.13%	8.15%	5.00%	4.97%	8.11%	5.67%	3.85%	3.78%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	5.79%	6.46%	2.61%	3.39%	11.40%	8.13%	6.25%	11.76%	10.21%	5.55%	3.91%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCFCX and URFFX in my portfolio?

FCFCX and URFFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCFCX or URFFX?

URFFX has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to FCFCX (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFCX dropped -38.93% vs URFFX's -44.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.