FCENX vs. GSINX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FCENX (Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor) and GSINX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FCENX returned 9.13%/yr vs 8.62%/yr for GSINX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCENX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for GSINX.

Performance

FCENX vs. GSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCENX achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than GSINX's 5.99% return.

FCENX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 9.67%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 22.98%
• 3Y*: 19.41%
• 5Y*: 9.13%
• 10Y*: —

GSINX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 5.99%
• 6M: 8.26%
• 1Y: 11.70%
• 3Y*: 17.01%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCENX vs. GSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCENX Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	9.67%	32.40%	6.04%	20.70%	-17.25%	14.98%	9.38%	8.79%
GSINX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	5.99%	20.76%	9.53%	21.93%	-11.14%	12.35%	15.64%	6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FCENX and GSINX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.82

The correlation between FCENX and GSINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCENX vs. GSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCENX

FCENX Risk / Return Rank: 31
FCENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FCENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FCENX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FCENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FCENX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

GSINX

GSINX Risk / Return Rank: 21
GSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
GSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
GSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
GSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
GSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCENX vs. GSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCENX	GSINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.27	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	1.78	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.23	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	1.58	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	5.21	+2.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCENX vs. GSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCENX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the GSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCENX and GSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCENX	GSINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	1.27	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.60	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.81	-0.14

Drawdowns

FCENX vs. GSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCENX drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, which is greater than GSINX's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCENX and GSINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCENX	GSINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.53%	-28.80%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-7.80%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.45%	-10.32%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.59%	-25.46%	-5.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-4.08%	+2.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-4.85%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	2.36%	+0.82%

Volatility

FCENX vs. GSINX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) at 2.97%. This indicates that FCENX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCENX	GSINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	2.97%	+1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.48%	7.95%	+4.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.18%	9.71%	+5.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.76%	14.37%	+1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.63%	15.69%	+1.94%

FCENX vs. GSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCENX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GSINX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCENX vs. GSINX - Dividend Comparison

FCENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.65%, more than GSINX's 4.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCENX Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	11.65%	13.50%	5.30%	4.11%	2.75%	8.56%	2.14%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%
GSINX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	4.74%	5.03%	11.11%	2.27%	4.79%	2.13%	0.08%	0.57%	0.43%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCENX and GSINX in my portfolio?

FCENX and GSINX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCENX or GSINX?

FCENX has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to GSINX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCENX dropped -31.53% vs GSINX's -28.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.