PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCEF vs. MFUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCEF vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCEF vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCEF
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF
-0.30%14.39%17.51%10.27%-19.51%0.42%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
-0.53%4.51%5.36%2.24%-12.46%-1.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCEF achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's -0.53% return.


FCEF

1D
2.15%
1M
-4.71%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
1.89%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*

MFUL

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCEF vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCEF has a 2.91% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FCEF vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCEF
FCEF Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUL
MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCEF vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCEFMFULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

0.69

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

0.94

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.14

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

0.94

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.37

3.33

+2.05

FCEF vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCEF and MFUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCEFMFULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.69

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

-0.20

+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between FCEF and MFUL is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FCEF vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

FCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, more than MFUL's 3.13% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FCEF
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF
7.21%7.05%7.13%7.17%7.26%4.74%5.03%5.07%5.96%4.90%1.51%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
3.13%3.31%2.59%5.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCEF vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCEF drawdown since its inception was -44.81%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEF and MFUL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCEFMFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.81%

-16.41%

-28.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.61%

-3.77%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.03%

-4.13%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.38%

-9.80%

+3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.06%

+1.13%

Volatility

FCEF vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.89%. This indicates that FCEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCEFMFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

1.89%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.29%

3.10%

+3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

4.75%

+7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.21%

4.22%

+7.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

4.22%

+11.30%