FCEF vs. MFUL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FCEF (First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FCEF returned 15.92%/yr vs 5.05%/yr for MFUL. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCEF charges 2.91%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.

Performance

FCEF vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCEF achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 3.57% return.

FCEF

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 7.01%
• 6M: 8.03%
• 1Y: 17.14%
• 3Y*: 15.92%
• 5Y*: 6.02%
• 10Y*: —

MFUL

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 3.57%
• 6M: 3.81%
• 1Y: 7.53%
• 3Y*: 5.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCEF vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FCEF First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF	7.01%	14.39%	17.51%	10.27%	-19.51%	0.42%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.57%	4.51%	5.36%	2.24%	-12.46%	-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FCEF and MFUL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021	0.60

The correlation between FCEF and MFUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCEF vs. MFUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCEF	MFUL
Financial Services	25.5%	10.7%
Utilities	15.0%	5.5%
Energy	13.6%	8.0%
Technology	11.9%	25.8%
Healthcare	9.2%	8.4%
Industrials	8.5%	9.9%
Communication Services	4.4%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	8.7%
Real Estate	3.5%	2.4%
Basic Materials	2.7%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	6.7%

Return for Risk

FCEF vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCEF

FCEF Risk / Return Rank: 63
FCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 62

MFUL

MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 54
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCEF vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCEF	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.93	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	2.74	+0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.38	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	2.27	+0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.41	8.78	+2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCEF vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCEF and MFUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCEF	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	1.93	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.02	+0.51

Drawdowns

FCEF vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCEF drawdown since its inception was -44.81%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEF and MFUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCEF	MFUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.81%	-16.41%	-28.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.03%	-3.36%	-3.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.39%	-4.74%	-7.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-0.18%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.28%	-9.51%	+3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	0.87%	+0.68%

Volatility

FCEF vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) has a higher volatility of 2.13% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.43%. This indicates that FCEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCEF	MFUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.13%	1.43%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.19%	3.23%	+2.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.73%	3.92%	+3.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.19%	4.24%	+7.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.42%	4.24%	+11.18%

FCEF vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCEF has a 2.91% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCEF vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

FCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than MFUL's 3.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FCEF First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF	6.82%	7.05%	7.13%	7.17%	7.26%	4.74%	5.03%	5.07%	5.96%	4.90%	1.51%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.00%	3.31%	2.59%	5.00%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCEF and MFUL in my portfolio?

FCEF and MFUL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCEF or MFUL?

FCEF has higher volatility (2.13%) compared to MFUL (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCEF dropped -44.81% vs MFUL's -16.41%.

Which ETF is better, FCEF or MFUL?

On 3-year performance, FCEF leads with 15.92% vs 5.05% for MFUL. On fees, MFUL is cheaper at 1.10% per year. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCEF or MFUL?

Over the 3-year period, FCEF has performed better with a 15.92% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCEF or MFUL?

MFUL is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 2.91% for FCEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCEF or MFUL?

FCEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.82%, compared with 3.00% for MFUL.

What is the main difference between FCEF and MFUL?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 2.91% for FCEF and 1.10% for MFUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.