FCEF vs. MDAA
FCEF (First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCEF charges 2.91%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.
Performance
FCEF vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCEF achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 23.50% return.
FCEF
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 8.03%
- 1Y
- 17.14%
- 3Y*
- 15.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.02%
- 10Y*
- —
MDAA
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 23.50%
- 6M
- 24.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCEF vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FCEF First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF | 7.01% | 1.40% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 23.50% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCEF and MDAA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCEF vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank
FCEF
MDAA
FCEF vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCEF | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCEF | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.57 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
FCEF vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCEF drawdown since its inception was -44.81%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEF and MDAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCEF | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.81% | -14.59% | -30.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | 0.00% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -2.94% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | — | — |
Volatility
FCEF vs. MDAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCEF | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.73% | 23.91% | -16.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 23.91% | -11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 23.91% | -8.49% |
FCEF vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCEF has a 2.91% expense ratio, which is higher than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCEF vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison
FCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than MDAA's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCEF First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF | 6.82% | 7.05% | 7.13% | 7.17% | 7.26% | 4.74% | 5.03% | 5.07% | 5.96% | 4.90% | 1.51% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCEF and MDAA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MDAA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MDAA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 2.91% for FCEF.
FCEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.82%, compared with 0.37% for MDAA.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 2.91% for FCEF and 0.97% for MDAA.
Find the right allocation for FCEF and MDAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer