FCDTX vs. AUERX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FCDTX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M) and AUERX (Auer Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCDTX returned 12.43%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for AUERX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCDTX charges 1.46%/yr vs 2.37%/yr for AUERX.

Performance

FCDTX vs. AUERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCDTX achieves a 20.06% return, which is significantly higher than AUERX's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FCDTX has underperformed AUERX with an annualized return of 12.43%, while AUERX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.

FCDTX

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 1.24%
• 6M: 14.70%
• YTD: 20.06%
• 1Y: 34.15%
• 3Y*: 18.73%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: 12.43%

AUERX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -1.99%
• 6M: 11.99%
• YTD: 13.71%
• 1Y: 37.43%
• 3Y*: 23.15%
• 5Y*: 20.30%
• 10Y*: 15.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCDTX vs. AUERX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCDTX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M	20.06%	13.73%	13.89%	18.79%	-18.70%	24.02%	21.08%	29.68%	-9.50%	10.97%
AUERX Auer Growth Fund	13.71%	30.10%	11.12%	21.42%	9.95%	45.11%	-1.85%	27.96%	-25.63%	28.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FCDTX and AUERX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2007	0.85

The correlation between FCDTX and AUERX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCDTX vs. AUERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCDTX

FCDTX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FCDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FCDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FCDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FCDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FCDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

AUERX

AUERX Risk / Return Rank: 85
AUERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
AUERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
AUERX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AUERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
AUERX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCDTX vs. AUERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCDTX	AUERX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.23	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	2.93	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.39	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	3.69	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.53	14.64	-2.11

FCDTX vs. AUERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCDTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the AUERX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCDTX and AUERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCDTX vs. AUERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCDTX drawdown since its inception was -65.78%, roughly equal to the maximum AUERX drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDTX and AUERX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCDTX	AUERX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.78%	-67.23%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.07%	-10.06%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.56%	-34.80%	+7.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.78%	-34.80%	+4.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.48%	-51.89%	+13.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.41%	-3.22%	+0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.34%	-24.75%	+12.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.53%	+0.11%

Volatility

FCDTX vs. AUERX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Auer Growth Fund (AUERX) at 4.47%. This indicates that FCDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCDTX	AUERX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.81%	4.47%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.23%	12.48%	+1.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.51%	16.66%	+1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.68%	24.81%	-3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.85%	24.34%	-2.49%

FCDTX vs. AUERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCDTX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is lower than AUERX's 2.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCDTX vs. AUERX - Dividend Comparison

FCDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than AUERX's 10.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUERX Auer Growth Fund	10.02%	11.39%	24.55%	4.54%	5.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCDTX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M	0.35%	0.42%	2.47%	0.00%	0.04%	11.15%	1.50%	1.91%	23.15%	10.48%	1.20%	6.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCDTX and AUERX in my portfolio?

FCDTX and AUERX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCDTX or AUERX?

FCDTX has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to AUERX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCDTX dropped -65.78% vs AUERX's -67.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.