PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCDCX vs. FSOPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCDCX vs. FSOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C (FCDCX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCDCX achieves a 19.08% return, which is significantly lower than FSOPX's 21.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FCDCX has underperformed FSOPX with an annualized return of 11.67%, while FSOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.


FCDCX

1D
1.68%
1M
-0.65%
6M
12.81%
YTD
19.08%
1Y
36.08%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
11.67%
ALL TIME*
7.31%

FSOPX

1D
1.81%
1M
-0.30%
6M
14.63%
YTD
21.27%
1Y
39.87%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
12.83%
ALL TIME*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCDCX vs. FSOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCDCX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C
19.08%13.17%13.33%18.21%-19.13%23.37%20.43%29.00%-9.94%10.46%
FSOPX
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund
21.27%15.81%15.31%20.38%-17.82%23.39%17.03%29.92%-8.12%11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FCDCX and FSOPX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007

0.99

The correlation between FCDCX and FSOPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCDCX vs. FSOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCDCX
FCDCX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FCDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FCDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FSOPX
FSOPX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FSOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FSOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCDCX vs. FSOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C (FCDCX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCDCXFSOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.64

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.08

13.81

-1.73

FCDCX vs. FSOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCDCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the FSOPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCDCX and FSOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCDCX vs. FSOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCDCX drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, which is greater than FSOPX's maximum drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDCX and FSOPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCDCXFSOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.05%

-61.75%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-9.99%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.71%

-27.17%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.01%

-30.06%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

-39.15%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-2.67%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.77%

-10.30%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.63%

+0.07%

Volatility

FCDCX vs. FSOPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C (FCDCX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) have volatilities of 4.47% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCDCXFSOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

4.54%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

14.38%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

18.67%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

21.74%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.86%

21.99%

-0.13%

FCDCX vs. FSOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCDCX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOPX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCDCX vs. FSOPX - Dividend Comparison

FCDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than FSOPX's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCDCX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C
0.39%0.46%2.71%0.00%0.00%11.76%1.62%2.06%24.14%11.06%1.26%7.10%
FSOPX
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund
3.64%4.41%9.41%0.98%5.16%30.85%2.01%6.67%13.99%10.31%0.69%5.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FCDCX and FSOPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSOPX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to FCDCX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCDCX dropped -66.05% vs FSOPX's -61.75%.

FSOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCDCX and FSOPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer