PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCDAX vs. WWSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCDAX vs. WWSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCDAX achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly lower than WWSIX's 26.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FCDAX has underperformed WWSIX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while WWSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.69% annualized return.


FCDAX

1D
0.83%
1M
0.96%
YTD
15.79%
6M
14.35%
1Y
38.50%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
12.56%

WWSIX

1D
1.16%
1M
4.17%
YTD
26.69%
6M
27.09%
1Y
60.23%
3Y*
24.00%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
14.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCDAX vs. WWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCDAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A
15.79%14.04%14.16%19.09%-18.47%24.38%21.39%30.05%-9.16%11.34%
WWSIX
Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional
26.69%17.55%15.79%12.87%-12.30%30.04%11.27%28.74%-13.49%16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FCDAX and WWSIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2008

0.94

The correlation between FCDAX and WWSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCDAX vs. WWSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCDAX
FCDAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FCDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FCDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

WWSIX
WWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
WWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCDAX vs. WWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCDAXWWSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.53

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

6.30

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.85

22.98

-7.13

FCDAX vs. WWSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the WWSIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCDAX and WWSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCDAXWWSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

3.10

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.55

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.62

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.44

-0.10

Drawdowns

FCDAX vs. WWSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCDAX drawdown since its inception was -65.62%, which is greater than WWSIX's maximum drawdown of -59.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDAX and WWSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCDAXWWSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.62%

-59.71%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-10.17%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

-26.17%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.67%

-26.17%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.46%

-45.11%

+6.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-0.34%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-8.96%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.78%

-0.20%

Volatility

FCDAX vs. WWSIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX) have volatilities of 5.23% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCDAXWWSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

5.21%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

13.81%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

20.70%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

21.65%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.86%

23.72%

-1.86%

FCDAX vs. WWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCDAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than WWSIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCDAX vs. WWSIX - Dividend Comparison

FCDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than WWSIX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCDAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A
0.38%0.44%2.61%0.02%0.08%10.93%1.44%1.96%22.71%10.34%1.43%6.93%
WWSIX
Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional
6.09%7.72%28.12%3.00%1.85%5.58%0.20%4.70%14.34%8.83%9.05%18.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FCDAX and WWSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCDAX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to WWSIX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCDAX dropped -65.62% vs WWSIX's -59.71%.

WWSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCDAX and WWSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer