PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCCVX vs. PISHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCCVX vs. PISHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) and Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCCVX achieves a 24.86% return, which is significantly higher than PISHX's 2.00% return.


FCCVX

1D
1.15%
1M
7.30%
YTD
24.86%
6M
24.23%
1Y
43.01%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
12.17%

PISHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
2.00%
6M
2.20%
1Y
8.70%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCCVX vs. PISHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C
24.86%17.04%7.28%10.24%-16.22%8.77%41.00%14.25%
PISHX
Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares
2.00%9.65%12.50%7.91%-11.73%4.30%8.57%12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCVX and PISHX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2019

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCCVX vs. PISHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCCVX
FCCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FCCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PISHX
PISHX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PISHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PISHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PISHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PISHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PISHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCCVX vs. PISHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) and Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCCVXPISHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.95

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.14

3.18

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.77

14.50

+9.27

FCCVX vs. PISHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the PISHX Sharpe Ratio of 3.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCVX and PISHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCCVXPISHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

3.74

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.91

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.82

+0.13

Drawdowns

FCCVX vs. PISHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCVX drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum PISHX drawdown of -27.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCVX and PISHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCCVXPISHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-27.12%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-2.83%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

-3.90%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.66%

-19.14%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-3.94%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

0.62%

+1.24%

Volatility

FCCVX vs. PISHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX) at 0.72%. This indicates that FCCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PISHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCCVXPISHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

0.72%

+4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.83%

2.10%

+9.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.82%

2.40%

+12.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.46%

4.57%

+8.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

7.35%

+6.29%

FCCVX vs. PISHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCVX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PISHX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCCVX vs. PISHX - Dividend Comparison

FCCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than PISHX's 5.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C
8.06%10.47%1.32%1.12%2.62%19.63%9.96%2.31%8.75%3.35%3.85%9.24%
PISHX
Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares
5.62%5.52%5.89%5.92%5.45%4.25%4.59%3.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCCVX and PISHX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCCVX has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to PISHX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCCVX dropped -25.13% vs PISHX's -27.12%.

PISHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCCVX and PISHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer