PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCCV.TO vs. AVUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCCV.TO vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Canadian Value ETF (FCCV.TO) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FCCV.TO is traded in CAD, while AVUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVUS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCCV.TO having a 16.48% return and AVUS slightly higher at 16.64%.


FCCV.TO

1D
0.95%
1M
5.64%
YTD
16.48%
6M
17.18%
1Y
48.88%
3Y*
25.60%
5Y*
17.71%
10Y*

AVUS

1D
0.66%
1M
6.48%
YTD
16.64%
6M
14.79%
1Y
35.61%
3Y*
24.16%
5Y*
16.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCCV.TO vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FCCV.TO
Fidelity Canadian Value ETF
16.48%36.93%15.47%11.16%-3.35%34.98%20.55%
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
16.64%11.33%30.78%19.09%-7.67%27.57%20.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCV.TO and AVUS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2020

0.51

The correlation between FCCV.TO and AVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCCV.TO vs. AVUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCCV.TO
AVUS

Financial Services

38.7%
15.2%

Basic Materials

23.0%
2.7%

Technology

12.4%
27.5%

Energy

11.4%
7.4%

Communication Services

5.7%
9.8%

Healthcare

3.7%
7.1%

Industrials

3.5%
11.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Financial Services

FCCV.TO
38.7%
AVUS
15.2%

Basic Materials

FCCV.TO
23.0%
AVUS
2.7%

Technology

FCCV.TO
12.4%
AVUS
27.5%

Energy

FCCV.TO
11.4%
AVUS
7.4%

Communication Services

FCCV.TO
5.7%
AVUS
9.8%

Healthcare

FCCV.TO
3.7%
AVUS
7.1%

Industrials

FCCV.TO
3.5%
AVUS
11.5%

Real Estate

FCCV.TO
1.7%
AVUS
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FCCV.TO

-

AVUS
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

FCCV.TO

-

AVUS
4.4%

Utilities

FCCV.TO

-

AVUS
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCCV.TO vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCCV.TO
FCCV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FCCV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUS
AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCCV.TO vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian Value ETF (FCCV.TO) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCCV.TOAVUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.56

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

5.80

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.71

23.31

-0.60

FCCV.TO vs. AVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is comparable to the AVUS Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCV.TO and AVUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCCV.TOAVUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51

3.00

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

1.09

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

0.95

+0.52

Drawdowns

FCCV.TO vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCV.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.81%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -31.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCV.TO and AVUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCCV.TOAVUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.81%

-31.12%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-6.17%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.31%

-20.44%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.81%

-20.44%

+0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-4.07%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.53%

+0.63%

Volatility

FCCV.TO vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Canadian Value ETF (FCCV.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) at 2.75%. This indicates that FCCV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCCV.TOAVUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

2.75%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.42%

8.94%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

11.95%

+2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

15.14%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.77%

18.39%

-3.62%

FCCV.TO vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCV.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCCV.TO vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison

FCCV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than AVUS's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
0.90%1.08%1.27%1.41%1.59%1.08%1.19%0.35%
FCCV.TO
Fidelity Canadian Value ETF
1.58%1.84%2.59%3.01%2.45%1.66%1.59%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCCV.TO and AVUS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FCCV.TO.

FCCV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCCV.TO and 0.15% for AVUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCCV.TO and AVUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer