FCCQ.TO vs. XDIV.TO
FCCQ.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF) and XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCCQ.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index, while XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCCQ.TO returned 13.37%/yr vs 16.42%/yr for XDIV.TO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCCQ.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XDIV.TO.
Performance
FCCQ.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCCQ.TO achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 19.17% return.
FCCQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 31.20%
- 3Y*
- 22.31%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- —
XDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 19.17%
- 6M
- 18.94%
- 1Y
- 38.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.42%
- 10Y*
- —
FCCQ.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 6.62% | 31.01% | 21.58% | 11.02% | -7.52% | 22.24% | 2.30% | 10.49% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 19.17% | 24.92% | 19.56% | 11.71% | 0.29% | 32.25% | -7.81% | 17.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCCQ.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019 | 0.48 |
The correlation between FCCQ.TO and XDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCCQ.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCCQ.TO
XDIV.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FCCQ.TO
XDIV.TO
Basic Materials
FCCQ.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Technology
FCCQ.TO
XDIV.TO
Energy
FCCQ.TO
XDIV.TO
Consumer Defensive
FCCQ.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
FCCQ.TO
XDIV.TO
Healthcare
FCCQ.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Industrials
FCCQ.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Real Estate
FCCQ.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Communication Services
FCCQ.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Utilities
FCCQ.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCCQ.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCCQ.TO
XDIV.TO
FCCQ.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCCQ.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 2.03 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 16.64 | -13.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 56.55 | -44.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCCQ.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 4.94 | -2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.57 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.81 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FCCQ.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCCQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, smaller than the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCQ.TO and XDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCCQ.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.31% | -41.30% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -2.33% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -10.53% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.97% | -17.60% | -0.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -0.09% | -2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -4.25% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 0.69% | +1.95% |
Volatility
FCCQ.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that FCCQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCCQ.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 2.81% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 6.36% | +5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.47% | 7.85% | +6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 10.53% | +3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 16.01% | +0.04% |
FCCQ.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCCQ.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCCQ.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCCQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than XDIV.TO's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 1.47% | 1.45% | 1.83% | 2.40% | 2.31% | 1.90% | 2.10% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 3.28% | 3.81% | 4.29% | 4.20% | 3.95% | 3.58% | 4.58% | 4.02% | 4.85% | 1.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCCQ.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FCCQ.TO.
FCCQ.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. FCCQ.TO tracks Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index, while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCCQ.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for FCCQ.TO and XDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer