FCCQ.TO vs. FCLS.NEO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FCCQ.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF) and FCLS.NEO (Fidelity Canadian Long/Short Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCCQ.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index, while FCLS.NEO is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Fidelity. FCCQ.TO is passively managed, while FCLS.NEO is actively managed. Over the past year, FCCQ.TO returned 29.90% vs 19.19% for FCLS.NEO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCCQ.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for FCLS.NEO.

Performance

FCCQ.TO vs. FCLS.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Long/Short Alternative ETF (FCLS.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCCQ.TO achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly higher than FCLS.NEO's 5.37% return.

FCCQ.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 6M: 4.72%
• 1Y: 29.90%
• 3Y*: 23.35%
• 5Y*: 13.54%
• 10Y*: —

FCLS.NEO

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -1.42%
• YTD: 5.37%
• 6M: 4.76%
• 1Y: 19.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCCQ.TO vs. FCLS.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF	5.82%	32.22%	21.25%
FCLS.NEO Fidelity Canadian Long/Short Alternative ETF	5.37%	18.33%	17.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCQ.TO and FCLS.NEO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	0.57

The correlation between FCCQ.TO and FCLS.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCCQ.TO vs. FCLS.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCCQ.TO

FCCQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 67
FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FCCQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FCCQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FCCQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FCCQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FCLS.NEO

FCLS.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 43
FCLS.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FCLS.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FCLS.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FCLS.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FCLS.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCCQ.TO vs. FCLS.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Long/Short Alternative ETF (FCLS.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCCQ.TO	FCLS.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.23	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.82	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.31	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	1.56	+1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.90	6.51	+4.39

FCCQ.TO vs. FCLS.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the FCLS.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCQ.TO and FCLS.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCCQ.TO vs. FCLS.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.56%, which is greater than FCLS.NEO's maximum drawdown of -14.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCQ.TO and FCLS.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCCQ.TO	FCLS.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.56%	-14.39%	-21.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	-12.39%	+1.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.41%	-3.84%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-2.09%	-1.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	2.96%	-0.21%

Volatility

FCCQ.TO vs. FCLS.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) is 3.85%, while Fidelity Canadian Long/Short Alternative ETF (FCLS.NEO) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that FCCQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCLS.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCCQ.TO	FCLS.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	6.78%	-2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.08%	13.91%	-1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.75%	15.65%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	14.04%	-0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.09%	14.04%	+2.05%

FCCQ.TO vs. FCLS.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCQ.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FCLS.NEO's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCCQ.TO vs. FCLS.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FCCQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than FCLS.NEO's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF	1.48%	1.44%	1.85%	2.41%	2.33%	1.92%	2.14%	2.33%
FCLS.NEO Fidelity Canadian Long/Short Alternative ETF	0.62%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCCQ.TO and FCLS.NEO in my portfolio?

FCCQ.TO and FCLS.NEO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCCQ.TO or FCLS.NEO?

On fees, FCCQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCCQ.TO or FCLS.NEO?

FCCQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for FCLS.NEO.

What is the main difference between FCCQ.TO and FCLS.NEO?

FCCQ.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while FCLS.NEO is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCCQ.TO and 1.27% for FCLS.NEO.