FCLS.NEO vs. FCMO.NEO
FCLS.NEO (Fidelity Canadian Long/Short Alternative ETF) and FCMO.NEO (Fidelity US Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCLS.NEO is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCMO.NEO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity Canada U.S. Momentum Index. FCLS.NEO is actively managed, while FCMO.NEO is passively managed. Over the past year, FCLS.NEO returned 21.94% vs 39.98% for FCMO.NEO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCLS.NEO charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FCMO.NEO.
Performance
FCLS.NEO vs. FCMO.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCLS.NEO achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than FCMO.NEO's 23.84% return.
FCLS.NEO
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 21.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCMO.NEO
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 23.84%
- 6M
- 24.80%
- 1Y
- 39.98%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 19.89%
- 10Y*
- —
FCLS.NEO vs. FCMO.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCLS.NEO Fidelity Canadian Long/Short Alternative ETF | 7.98% | 18.33% | 17.30% |
FCMO.NEO Fidelity US Momentum ETF | 23.84% | 13.77% | 46.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLS.NEO and FCMO.NEO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLS.NEO vs. FCMO.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FCLS.NEO
FCMO.NEO
FCLS.NEO vs. FCMO.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian Long/Short Alternative ETF (FCLS.NEO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCLS.NEO | FCMO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 3.68 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | 12.47 | -4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCLS.NEO vs. FCMO.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLS.NEO drawdown since its inception was -14.39%, smaller than the maximum FCMO.NEO drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLS.NEO and FCMO.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLS.NEO | FCMO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.39% | -67.39% | +53.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.39% | -10.91% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -5.74% | +4.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -49.28% | +47.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 3.21% | -0.27% |
Volatility
FCLS.NEO vs. FCMO.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian Long/Short Alternative ETF (FCLS.NEO) is 6.95%, while Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that FCLS.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCMO.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLS.NEO | FCMO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | 8.84% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 16.62% | -2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 19.67% | -4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 18.27% | -4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 32.72% | -18.68% |
FCLS.NEO vs. FCMO.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLS.NEO has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FCMO.NEO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLS.NEO vs. FCMO.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FCLS.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than FCMO.NEO's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLS.NEO Fidelity Canadian Long/Short Alternative ETF | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCMO.NEO Fidelity US Momentum ETF | 0.29% | 0.36% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLS.NEO and FCMO.NEO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCMO.NEO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCMO.NEO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for FCLS.NEO.
FCLS.NEO is categorized as Long-Short, while FCMO.NEO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for FCLS.NEO and 0.38% for FCMO.NEO.
Find the right allocation for FCLS.NEO and FCMO.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer