PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCCNX vs. TIVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCCNX vs. TIVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCCNX achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than TIVFX's 35.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCCNX having a 9.39% annualized return and TIVFX not far ahead at 9.61%.


FCCNX

1D
0.84%
1M
2.33%
YTD
7.49%
6M
11.21%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
9.39%

TIVFX

1D
0.11%
1M
3.80%
YTD
35.17%
6M
39.21%
1Y
66.10%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCCNX vs. TIVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C
7.49%24.54%8.02%13.45%-7.16%25.48%3.30%24.51%-15.19%12.83%
TIVFX
American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund
35.17%36.15%3.73%15.43%-20.57%7.53%12.61%19.38%-19.87%24.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCNX and TIVFX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.71

The correlation between FCCNX and TIVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCCNX vs. TIVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCCNX
FCCNX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FCCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

TIVFX
TIVFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TIVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TIVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCCNX vs. TIVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCCNXTIVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.61

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

5.75

-3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

21.04

-13.58

FCCNX vs. TIVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the TIVFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCNX and TIVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCCNXTIVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

3.64

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.60

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.55

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.40

-0.15

Drawdowns

FCCNX vs. TIVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCNX drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than TIVFX's maximum drawdown of -54.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCNX and TIVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCCNXTIVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.44%

-54.21%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

-11.69%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.38%

-23.99%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.39%

-36.31%

+14.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.97%

-41.51%

+1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-1.91%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.31%

-13.38%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

3.19%

-0.84%

Volatility

FCCNX vs. TIVFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) is 2.76%, while American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that FCCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCCNXTIVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

6.58%

-3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

15.06%

-5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

18.47%

-5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

18.61%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

17.62%

-0.19%

FCCNX vs. TIVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCNX has a 1.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TIVFX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCCNX vs. TIVFX - Dividend Comparison

FCCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than TIVFX's 6.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C
4.36%4.69%6.15%2.29%2.74%3.65%1.40%3.06%6.14%0.91%0.61%0.15%
TIVFX
American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund
6.53%8.82%10.23%1.66%1.39%3.65%0.34%1.69%1.37%1.28%1.57%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCCNX and TIVFX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIVFX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to FCCNX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCCNX dropped -58.44% vs TIVFX's -54.21%.

TIVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCCNX and TIVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer