PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCCD.TO achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly lower than FLVC.NEO's 21.78% return.


FCCD.TO

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.86%
6M
13.58%
YTD
16.58%
1Y
32.14%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.67%

FLVC.NEO

1D
0.33%
1M
3.35%
6M
23.34%
YTD
21.78%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$234.57KCA$183.58KCA$169.79K
CA$134.83KCA$145.15KCA$488.47K

FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FCCD.TO
Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF
16.58%25.05%12.86%
FLVC.NEO
Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
21.78%21.15%13.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCD.TO and FLVC.NEO is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.47

The correlation between FCCD.TO and FLVC.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO

Financial Services

29.5%
43.0%

Energy

23.1%
8.8%

Basic Materials

10.6%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
7.0%

Utilities

9.5%
10.8%

Real Estate

6.8%

-

Communication Services

5.6%
7.5%

Industrials

3.7%
13.7%

Technology

0.5%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Financial Services

FCCD.TO
29.5%
FLVC.NEO
43.0%

Energy

FCCD.TO
23.1%
FLVC.NEO
8.8%

Basic Materials

FCCD.TO
10.6%
FLVC.NEO
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FCCD.TO
10.5%
FLVC.NEO
7.0%

Utilities

FCCD.TO
9.5%
FLVC.NEO
10.8%

Real Estate

FCCD.TO
6.8%
FLVC.NEO

-

Communication Services

FCCD.TO
5.6%
FLVC.NEO
7.5%

Industrials

FCCD.TO
3.7%
FLVC.NEO
13.7%

Technology

FCCD.TO
0.5%
FLVC.NEO
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

FCCD.TO

-

FLVC.NEO
6.9%

Healthcare

FCCD.TO

-

FLVC.NEO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCCD.TO
FCCD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FCCD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FLVC.NEO
FLVC.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLVC.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCCD.TOFLVC.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

2.02

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.53

12.45

-6.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.39

55.03

-29.65

FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is comparable to the FLVC.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 5.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCD.TO and FLVC.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCD.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.53%, which is greater than FLVC.NEO's maximum drawdown of -7.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCD.TO and FLVC.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCCD.TOFLVC.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.53%

-7.89%

-35.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-3.21%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.50%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-0.80%

-5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

0.71%

+0.52%

Volatility

FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) is 2.36%, while Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that FCCD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLVC.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCCD.TOFLVC.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

2.84%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

5.74%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

7.91%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.50%

11.38%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

11.38%

+5.58%

FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCD.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLVC.NEO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FCCD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than FLVC.NEO's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCCD.TO
Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF
2.98%3.56%4.27%4.65%4.01%3.02%4.74%3.80%0.16%
FLVC.NEO
Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.70%4.96%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCCD.TO and FLVC.NEO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLVC.NEO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLVC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FCCD.TO.

FCCD.TO is categorized as Dividend, while FLVC.NEO is Canada Equities. FCCD.TO tracks Fidelity Canada Canadian High Dividend Index, while FLVC.NEO tracks Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCCD.TO and 0.15% for FLVC.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCCD.TO and FLVC.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer