FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO
FCCD.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF) and FLVC.NEO (Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCCD.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Dividend Index, while FLVC.NEO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FCCD.TO returned 32.14% vs 36.38% for FLVC.NEO. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FCCD.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLVC.NEO.
Performance
FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCCD.TO achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly lower than FLVC.NEO's 21.78% return.
FCCD.TO
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 32.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.67%
FLVC.NEO
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 23.34%
- YTD
- 21.78%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$234.57K | CA$183.58K | CA$169.79K | |
| CA$134.83K | CA$145.15K | CA$488.47K |
FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 16.58% | 25.05% | 12.86% |
FLVC.NEO Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 21.78% | 21.15% | 13.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCCD.TO and FLVC.NEO is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024 | 0.47 |
The correlation between FCCD.TO and FLVC.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO
Energy
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO
Basic Materials
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO
Consumer Cyclical
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO
Utilities
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO
Real Estate
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO
-
Communication Services
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO
Industrials
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO
Technology
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO
Consumer Defensive
FCCD.TO
-
FLVC.NEO
Healthcare
FCCD.TO
-
FLVC.NEO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FCCD.TO
FLVC.NEO
FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCCD.TO | FLVC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 2.02 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 12.45 | -6.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.39 | 55.03 | -29.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCCD.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.53%, which is greater than FLVC.NEO's maximum drawdown of -7.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCD.TO and FLVC.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCCD.TO | FLVC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.53% | -7.89% | -35.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -3.21% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.50% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -0.80% | -5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 0.71% | +0.52% |
Volatility
FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) is 2.36%, while Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that FCCD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLVC.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCCD.TO | FLVC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 2.84% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 5.74% | +1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 7.91% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.50% | 11.38% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 11.38% | +5.58% |
FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCCD.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLVC.NEO's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCCD.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FCCD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than FLVC.NEO's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 2.98% | 3.56% | 4.27% | 4.65% | 4.01% | 3.02% | 4.74% | 3.80% | 0.16% |
FLVC.NEO Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.70% | 4.96% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCCD.TO and FLVC.NEO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLVC.NEO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLVC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FCCD.TO.
FCCD.TO is categorized as Dividend, while FLVC.NEO is Canada Equities. FCCD.TO tracks Fidelity Canada Canadian High Dividend Index, while FLVC.NEO tracks Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCCD.TO and 0.15% for FLVC.NEO.
Find the right allocation for FCCD.TO and FLVC.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer