FCCD.TO vs. BLOV.TO
FCCD.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF) and BLOV.TO (Brompton North American Low Volatility Dividend ETF) are both Dividend funds. FCCD.TO is passively managed, while BLOV.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCCD.TO returned 12.29%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for BLOV.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FCCD.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCCD.TO achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than BLOV.TO's 13.33% return.
FCCD.TO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 12.82%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 32.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- —
BLOV.TO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
FCCD.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 16.64% | 25.05% | 16.92% | 3.35% | -4.04% | 29.46% | 17.15% |
BLOV.TO Brompton North American Low Volatility Dividend ETF | 13.33% | 14.08% | 11.35% | -1.53% | -6.53% | 21.12% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCCD.TO and BLOV.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2020 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCCD.TO vs. BLOV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCCD.TO
BLOV.TO
FCCD.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) and Brompton North American Low Volatility Dividend ETF (BLOV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCCD.TO | BLOV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.45 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.76 | 3.91 | +1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.46 | 13.07 | +13.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCCD.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCCD.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.53%, smaller than the maximum BLOV.TO drawdown of -46.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCD.TO and BLOV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCCD.TO | BLOV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.53% | -46.98% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -5.23% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.94% | -41.86% | +31.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.24% | -46.98% | +27.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.47% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -4.48% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 1.56% | -0.33% |
Volatility
FCCD.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) is 2.52%, while Brompton North American Low Volatility Dividend ETF (BLOV.TO) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that FCCD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCCD.TO | BLOV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 4.85% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 7.78% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.70% | 9.18% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.52% | 33.19% | -21.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 30.16% | -13.17% |
Dividends
FCCD.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCCD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than BLOV.TO's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOV.TO Brompton North American Low Volatility Dividend ETF | 3.71% | 4.13% | 4.51% | 4.80% | 4.25% | 3.19% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 2.96% | 3.56% | 4.27% | 4.65% | 4.01% | 3.02% | 4.74% | 3.80% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCCD.TO and BLOV.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Brompton.
Find the right allocation for FCCD.TO and BLOV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer